Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
TIPSHEET: What will climate change do to our health?
07 Apr 2008 07:04:00 GMT
Written by: Megan Rowling
A child with symptoms of dengue fever waits for medical attention at a temporary shelter set up by the Air Force in Rio de Janeiro, March 31, 2008. REUTERS/Bruno Domingos
A child with symptoms of dengue fever waits for medical attention at a temporary shelter set up by the Air Force in Rio de Janeiro, March 31, 2008. REUTERS/Bruno Domingos

Scientists and health experts are working to gather more data and evidence on how climate change affects diseases and other aspects of health. Statistics are hard to come by.

Between 1997 and 2006, weather-related disasters killed an average of 71,000 people a year, according to the Brussels-based Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. But it's impossible to say to what extent those disasters were caused by climate change.

People often cite a World Health Organisation estimate that the effects of climate change since the mid-1970s may have caused over 150,000 deaths in 2000. WHO says the impacts are likely to increase in the future.

On the positive side, global warming could bring limited local benefits, such as fewer winter deaths in temperate climates and increased food production in high-latitude regions. But the consequences are likely to be overwhelmingly negative, particularly for the world's poorest communities.

Who's most at risk? Besides those without access to health services, WHO singles out people living in small island developing countries, mountainous regions, areas where water resources are already stretched, megacities and coastal zones in developing countries - like India and Bangladesh.

One major problem is that the health consequences of predicted declines in freshwater supplies and crop yields, sea-level rises and displacement caused by dwindling natural resources are hard to measure - and we may not know these for several decades. They include malnutrition and illnesses caused by lack access to clean drinking water and sanitation.

The first detectable signs of the impact of climate change on human health are likely to be alterations in the geographic areas affected by vector-borne diseases like malaria and dengue fever - and their seasonality. Here are some of the potential medical effects:

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

3 responses to “TIPSHEET: What will climate change do to our health?”

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
  1. Kare says:

    Hello. Another outcome, that may sound a little fantastic, but possible; labs looking at viral diseases and things like could be carried away in several types of storms and disaster situations. They might consider battening down the hatches a little tighter!

  2. Natalie says:

    Figures horrifying, it really acute problem for today.

  3. Greg Kiker says:

    Scientific Consensus? - That Global Warming is Natural - and BENEFICIAL?

    IT IS TIME FOR TRUTH

    Dr. Arthur Robinson will be announcing Monday that over 31,000 scientists reject’s IPCC’s contention of anthropogenic global warming. They further hold that the natural global warming is beneficial. The site gives an excellent summary of supporting research. This cite and its history are instructive on the methods to overturn the ruling paradigm and media mentality.

    The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM) will announce that more than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition rejecting claims of human-caused global warming. The purpose of OISM’s Petition Project is to demonstrate that the claim of “settled science” and an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and consequent climate damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the petition text and signatory list, a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis.

    It is evident that 31,072 Americans with university degrees in science - including 9,021 PhDs, are not “a few.” Moreover, from the clear and strong petition statement that they have signed, it is evident that these 31,072 American scientists are not “skeptics.”

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.

Before joining AlertNet, Megan Rowling worked as a freelance print and television journalist in Britain, France and Japan. At AlertNet, she specialises in the humanitarian impact of climate change. In 2008, she also spent several months working part-time as a media relations officer for the British Red Cross. She has an MSc in development management.
Blogroll Reuters Environment Blog
Dot Earth (Andrew C. Revkin, New York Times)
oDToday (openDemocracy)
Guatemala Solidarity Network: the blog
Conor Foley (comment is free...)
Uganda's Scarlett Lion

Related articles


Background information


Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Thu Dec 3 18:04:08 2009