Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
MEDIAWATCH: Is African opinion hardening against Bashir?
12 Mar 2009 17:26:00 GMT
Written by: Joanne Tomkinson
Sudan's President Omar Hassan al-Bashir delivers a speech during a rally in Al Fasher, northern Darfur March 8, 2009. 
<BR>REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra
Sudan's President Omar Hassan al-Bashir delivers a speech during a rally in Al Fasher, northern Darfur March 8, 2009.
REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra

Sudan's President Omar Hassan al-Bashir has traditionally found considerable support in Africa and the Arab world, but there are growing signs in some quarters of the media that the tide of opinion is beginning to turn against him.

The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Bashir last week over war crimes in Darfur, a decision that some analysts fear could spark more regional turmoil. Khartoum has already responded by kicking out 13 major foreign aid agencies.

In the African media, there are still many who call into question the ICC's right to issue a warrant and accuse the West of massive hypocrisy.

"As things stand the body count in Iraq and surrounds is far in excess of anything that Bashir is accused of and yet somehow those charges are hardly receiving anything like the same attention," writes Mike Trapido, on South Africa's Mail and Guardian website.

But there are also a growing number of commentators asking African leaders to do more to put pressure on the indicted president.

"The African countries must take the lead in pressuring the Sudanese regime to let charity missions and peacekeeping troops operate unhindered," says an editorial in Kenya's Daily Nation.

"They (African countries) must make it clear to Al-Bashir if the innocent people of Darfur remain under the threat of genocide and extermination, Africa will not stand idly by, but will fully support the warrant of arrest and take whatever measures necessary to see it effected," the paper urges.

"All African leaders who support Mr Bashir must realise that their own hands could be stained by the blood of the Darfur people."

Uganda's New Vision predicts that pretty soon African leaders will be rushing to distance themselves from Bashir rather than support him.

"Make no mistake about the impact of the issuance of the arrest warrant for Bashir. At the very minimum it tells the world that Bashir is a tainted man, one in whose company any self-respecting leader must never be caught dead," the New Vision editorial says.

"Indeed, with time, the chorus of support for the Sudanese leader heard in many African capitals last week will quietly die away, replaced by polite avoidance," the editorial predicts.

The paper also adds that many heads of government will now begin to scrutinise their own human rights records and policies.

In the Arab world, a similar trend is emerging, writes Nicholas Kristoff in the New York Times.

"If you look closely - okay, very, very closely - you see some fissures between Sudan and the larger Arab community, which previously was stalwart in supporting President Bashir," he says.

There seems to be some support for this view, in the Arab media accessible in English at least.

"As can be expected, pundits in the Arab world are leaping to their microphones to defend the presumed butcher of Darfur by claiming the ICC is acting out on orders from the CIA, the Mossad and, the usual ridiculous rhetoric that is typically associated in defending the enemies of democracy," says an editorial in the Middle East Times.

"The Arab world should stop fighting the demons that live within many; and start to embrace the rulings of the ICC. It is a guarantee that even the most ruthless of dictators cannot remain immune to the extremely long arm of the law. Especially when it comes in the form of an international court," the paper urges.

This view is echoed by Tariq Alhomayed, Editor-in-Chief of Asharq Al-Awsat.

"When Ali Larijani (secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council until his recent resignation) says that the targeting of the Sudanese President is an insult to Muslims, it raises the following questions: aren't the people, or let us say victims, of Darfur also Muslims? Isn't it insulting to "Islamic" Iran to approve of this kind of tyranny against the people of Darfur?" Alhomayed writes.

"And when Hamas defends al Bashir, reminding the Arab leaders of Saddam Hussein's fate, it raises the following questions: what about Saddam Hussein's Iraqi victims? What about what he did to Iraq during all those years as ruler until he was found in that infamous pit? What about his Arab victims?"

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.

Joanne Tomkinson joined AlertNet from Oxfam in 2007. She regularly scans the global coverage of emergencies and digests the most interesting highlights for AlertNet's MediaWatch section.

Related articles


Background information


Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Thu Mar 12 17:35:35 2009