Typhoon-hit Philippines: could more have been done?
Written by: Katie Nguyen

A mother carries her children inside a public school used as an evacuation center for survivors of the floods caused by the continuous rains of Typhoon Ketsana in the town of Tanay, Rizal east of Manila. REUTERS/John Javellana
LONDON (AlertNet) - As survivors of the worst flooding in 40 years in the Philippines begin to sift through the debris of their destroyed homes or mop up the thick mud caused by landslides, questions have been raised as to whether more could have been done to reduce the impact of the disaster that has killed hundreds. Days after Typhoon Ketsana struck dumping 410 mm of rain in 24 hours - the average amount of rainfall for an entire month - on the capital Manila and its surrounding areas, the country was braced for more storms this week. The Philippines, one of the world's most disaster-prone countries, is battered by tropical storms every year. It leads a World Bank list of nations most in danger of facing frequent and more intense storms because of climate change. But even though the government has taken steps to improve early warning systems and the weather station forecast a typhoon, no one expected the torrential downpour during the storm, dubbed a "once-in-a-lifetime typhoon" by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. "These kinds of disasters are so unpredictable now and you keep thinking what else you can do to strengthen the disaster risk reduction programme in the Philippines," said Christian Aid country manager Daphne Villaneuva who was forced to leave her home with her husband and two teenage children. The floods deluged about 80 percent of Manila - a city of 15 million people. The death toll from the typhoon stood at 246 people on Tuesday. Some 375,000 more were forced to abandon their homes and take refuge in evacuation centres like schools and churches. The water, which reached 2 metres high in parts, receded in some areas to reveal cars piled on top of each other, wrecked furniture and damaged electrical cables. Villaneuva and her family battled through water that was neck high and at times so deep they had to swim. "I wasn't thinking while I was on the street about the house. I was just thinking about surviving and holding on to my children and making sure we got to safety. It was only when we got to the evacuation centre that we realised it was probably all gone," she told AlertNet. CALL FOR REFORM Villaneuva recalls seeing others from her neighbourhood turning back to their submerged houses when the floodwaters grew too strong -- rather than push on to the evacuation centre. "There's so much that can be improved in terms of forecasting. I think there's enough technology and science that we are able to do that. Of course, there's a question of budget ... but I think it's worth the price," Villaneuva said. There were several reports of a release of water from two dams which compounded the flooding around Manila. "If there was indeed a case of dams being opened -- that has to be done better. There was no warning system asking for people to leave that area," Villaneuva added.
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.
