FACTBOX-Differences between refugees and internally displaced
Written by: Olesya Dmitracova

Children displaced by fighting in Muhajiriya stand at Zamzam IDP camp in North Darfur, February 2009. REUTERS/N. Markogiannis/UNAMID/Handout
LONDON (AlertNet) - African countries are expected to adopt a ground-breaking convention providing rights for the first time to millions of internally displaced people at a summit in the Ugandan capital Kampala this week. Africa is home to some 12 million internally displaced people (IDPs) - those uprooted within their own country - or almost half of the world's IDPs. Unlike refugees - people who have fled to another country - IDPs benefit from little or no protection. Here is a summary of how the two groups are treated. REFUGEES The main source of refugee law - a 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol - describes a refugee as someone forced to leave his or her home country by a well-founded fear of persecution because of his or her race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. Regional conventions in Africa and Latin America have expanded the definition of a refugee to include people who have fled war, violence or massive violations of human rights in their country. The 1951 convention sets out refugees' rights in host countries, which include the right to work, the right to housing and the most important right not to be expelled or returned to the country of origin where a refugee's life or freedom would be threatened because of persecution. Refugees have a specialist U.N. agency to help them, the UNHCR. INTERNALLY DISPLACED PEOPLE The 1998 Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement define IDPs as people forced to flee because of war, violence, human rights violations or natural or human-made disasters and who have not crossed an international border. Unlike refugees, IDPs remain at the mercy of their government, which may view them as enemies of the state. They may also fall prey to rebels and militias operating inside or outside camps for displaced people. There is no single international agency, nor an international treaty, that focuses on internal displacement, and many IDPs receive no humanitarian aid or protection at all. However, IDPs are protected by the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which entitles everyone to the right to life, liberty and security and prohibits torture, slavery, arbitrary arrest and detention among other rights. During armed conflict, civilian IDPs are also covered by the so-called laws of war spelt out in the Geneva Conventions, which require protecting civilians from attack. The U.N. refugee agency helps IDPs in some situations because the reasons and consequences of their forced migration are often similar to those of refugees. Sources: UNHCR guide to international refugee law Guiding principles on internal displacement Convention and protocol relating to the status of refugees Protecting refugees: a field guide for NGOs (Additional reporting by Branka Juran)
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
2 responses to “FACTBOX-Differences between refugees and internally displaced”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.

22 Oct 2009 08:13:45 GMT
Thanks for your excellent coverage of this important issue. However, it must be stressed that in situations of armed conflict IDPs as civilians are protected by international humanitarian law which also spells out the obligations of conflict parties - both states and non-state groups - towards them. The fact that there is no 'IDP Convention' should not be understood to mean that IDPs are somehow outside international law. Florian Westphal, Head of Media, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
22 Oct 2009 13:46:46 GMT
Thanks for your excellent coverage of this important issue. However, it must be stressed that in situations of armed conflict IDPs as civilians are protected by international humanitarian law which also spells out the obligations of conflict parties - both states and non-state groups - towards them. The fact that there is no 'IDP Convention' should not be understood to mean that IDPs are somehow outside international law. Florian Westphal, Head of Media, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)