Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
Guyana may cut more forests despite Norway deal
20 Nov 2009 12:47:00 GMT
Written by: Olesya Dmitracova
Guyana's  Kaieteur Falls are seen from a natural overlook above the Potaro River in southwest Guyana. The South American nation has some of the most intact tropical forests in the world. REUTERS/STR New
Guyana's Kaieteur Falls are seen from a natural overlook above the Potaro River in southwest Guyana. The South American nation has some of the most intact tropical forests in the world. REUTERS/STR New

LONDON (AlertNet) - An agreement by Norway to pay Guyana for preserving forests to help slow climate change will still allow the South American nation to increase its rate of deforestation, Guyana's President Bharrat Jagdeo said.

Norway could pay Guyana up to $250 million by 2015, in a possible forerunner of a global scheme where rich nations pay the developing world to preserve rainforests.

The scheme is expected to be part of a new global climate change treaty, which negotiators will work toward at a U.N. climate summit in Copenhagen next month.

Destruction of tropical forests accounts for about 12 percent of global carbon emissions, scientists estimated earlier this month, and paying countries to maintain their forests is considered one of the cheaper ways to fight global warming.

NATION HAS SOME OF BEST-PRESERVED FORESTS

Forests in Guyana have been preserved far better than in many tropical nations and today cover three-quarters of the country. Under the terms of the new deal with Norway, Guyana could actually be paid to increase its rate of deforestation.

When asked whether Guyana will be allowed to increase deforestation under the agreement, Jagdeo said: "Basically yes."

He was speaking to reporters, campaigners and researchers in London late on Wednesday.

The memorandum, signed last week, states that Norway will compensate Guyana if it does not cut down more than 0.45 percent of its forests per year. But Guyana is felling far fewer trees than that at present.

Guyana's maximum allowed rate of deforestation may be revised once the United Nations has established the best way of calculating it, the memo says.

Jagdeo said that Guyana's current rate was uncertain but likely between 0.1 percent and 0.3 percent.

"We are going to do some detailed work between now and October 2010 when we will know what that figure is ... That may cause some adjustment," he told a briefing.

The maximum of 0.45 percent is a middle point between Guyana's estimated deforestation rate of 0.3 percent and the average rate of 0.6 percent for countries with tropical forests.

TARGET AIMS NOT TO DISADVANTAGE

Setting a stiffer target for countries like Guyana, whose forests are relatively intact, would disadvantage them compared with nations where deforestation rates are high, Jagdeo said. The latter group includes Brazil and Indonesia.

But some environmental groups were unhappy.

"I think the problem is that the agreement has tried to apply a mechanism for reducing emissions from deforestation in a situation where there is actually very little deforestation," said Simon Counsell from the Rainforest Foundation UK.

The United States this week also pledged $275 million toward rainforest protection under the proposed U.N. Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries, or REDD.

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.

Olesya Dmitracova joined AlertNet in 2009 after spending two years covering the financial crisis for Reuters in London and a year covering general and political news in the Reuters Moscow bureau. She had previously worked for BBC World Service and regional media in Britain. Olesya is originally from Moldova.

Related articles


Background information


Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Fri Nov 20 15:55:07 2009