Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
The 20th World Aids Day, and what's changed?
30 Nov 2007 18:30:00 GMT
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.
Pierre Andre Mansour Dalmeida poses for a portrait wearing a t-shirt with the double message of protecting against computer viruses and HIV/AIDS in Senegal's capital Dakar. REUTERS/ Finbarr O'Reilly
Pierre Andre Mansour Dalmeida poses for a portrait wearing a t-shirt with the double message of protecting against computer viruses and HIV/AIDS in Senegal's capital Dakar. REUTERS/ Finbarr O'Reilly

Does the news that the United Nations overestimated the number of HIV infections mean the world has turned the tide on AIDS?

Not according to the most of the media coverage ahead of the 20th World Aids Day this Saturday.

The fact that the United Nations got it wrong about the number of people living with the virus is simply "a sampling error", writes Donald McNeil in the International Herald Tribune.

The U.N. and the World Health Organisation "have eaten a lot of crow" for the mistake of miscalculating the number of infected, comments Los Angeles Times.

But the good news is that the pandemic has peaked, the papers say, most likely in the late 1990s. But that doesn't mean the world can relax and get complacent about AIDS. Even if the estimate of 2.5 million new infections this year is 40 percent lower than the estimate for 2006, that's "not a particularly happy plateau," McNeil quotes Dr. Robert Gallo, who discovered the AIDS virus.

It's hard to get excited when more than 2 million people - most of them in sub-Saharan Africa - are still dying from the disease each year and 15 percent of the population in eight countries in the south of the African continent are infected, says the International Herald Tribune in its editorial.

Take Zimbabwe, for example. This year has seen a drop in HIV prevalence rates in the country, but AIDS is still one of the biggest challenges the country faces, according to Owen Mugurungi, who heads the government's HIV/AIDS and TB unit, quoted by Zimbabwe's Financial Gazette. In a country with so many economic and political challenges right now, such a statement is not to be taken lightly. And the grim statistics back it up - we're talking about at least 2500 AIDS-related deaths a week in Zimbabwe.

Elizabeth Taylor, writing in USA Today, highlights the fact that the problem of AIDS is still very much present in the United States as well, in particular amongst the country's black population. The rate of HIV/AIDS diagnosis, for instance, is 20 times higher for black women than their white counterparts.

The Chinese papers acknowledge the fact that the stigma surrounding AIDS is a crucial problem in tackling the disease, but there's some good news. The Shanghai Daily reports that, according to Health Minister Chen Zhu, more than 40 percent of sex workers now use condoms. This compares to less than 15 percent six years ago and Zhu attributes it to the success of awareness programmes about the disease.

In India, the awareness campaigners still have a long way to go, judging by some of the results of a global study conducted by the MAC AIDS Fund. Almost 60 percent of those surveyed believed there was a cure for AIDS and over 40 percent said they wouldn't want to live in the same house as a person infected with the virus, The Hindu reports.

And if you thought Western Europe didn't have to battle misconceptions like that, a survey commissioned by the British Red Cross shows otherwise. One in seven young British people aged between 14 and 25 say they wouldn't stay friends with an HIV-infected person. According to a survey quoted by Britain's Mirror , the number is almost as high as in South Africa. And that's a country where about 19 percent of the population is HIV-positive.

These reports from around the world show there's still a lot of work to be done fighting the pandemic and the prejudice that accompanies it. The latest revised figures are indeed good news and, as the IHT's McNeil points out, this is at least the sign that AIDS will eventually behave "like other pestilences" and there will, in the end, be a solution to one of the most deadly diseases the world has seen.

But right now, in the words of the LA Times' editorial: "(Any) way you count them, the millions of needless deaths from this disease are too many, and too little is being committed to solve the problem."

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

2 responses to “The 20th World Aids Day, and what's changed?”

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
  1. Irene Atieno says:

    As a HIV/AIDS counselling trainer in kenya ,looking at the figures I still bealive there is more to be done in the eradication of HIV/AIDS especially in Sub Saharan africa now more than ever the world should put more efforts in the fight against HIV/AIDS.

  2. simon monday says:

    The fight against aids should and must go on resolutely un abated, it is absolutely wrong for some cynics to call aids ablack mans dieseas, the media in the western world is quick at distorting facts.. The bodies responsible for protecting humanity are being turned into aplaform for radicalisation. surely, I dont expect any UN agency to come up with abiased report on any member nation?

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content in this article, including by framing or by similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.


Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Wed Dec 9 12:33:47 2009