Email 
Print 
Is DDT really such a good idea?
Written by: AlertNet
Another critic voices his objections to the World Health Organisation's recent decision to allow DDT spray to be used indoors in the fight against malaria. Chris White, malaria programme leader with the African Medical and Research Foundation, accuses the West of "(throwing) out opinions without really understanding the context or culture of Africa." For DDT to be effective against the disease, at least 80 per cent of all households must be covered every 6-12 months, and this involves coordinated teams, he writes in The Nation. White suggests that to even imagine any such "full-scale military exercise" in the Congo basin, for example, is ludicrous. Nets, on the other hand, last four to five years. "The new WHO statement is misleading and operationally unsound," he concludes. Franklin Cudjoe, director of Ghanaian think-tank Imani and co-author of "The Water Revolution: Practical Solutions to Water Scarcity", is full of praise for the move. "Bravo, WHO!" he writes in Ghana's Accra Mail. "Please keep thinking right!"
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
1 response to “Is DDT really such a good idea?”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.
26 Sep 2006 08:42:44 GMT
Mr. White erects another awkward strawman for the anti-DDT community to maul when he claims that advocates of an integrated approach to malaria control including DDT are also arguing for it to be used *everywhere*. Neither WHO nor advocacy organizations like Africa Fighting Malaria believe that any single approach will eradicate malaria in Africa. What they are saying is that each country should be free within a given donor-financed malaria control program to develop its own approach, including IRS with DDT.