Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
HAVE YOUR SAY: Would regulating mineral trade stop Congo violence?
21 Apr 2009 13:56:00 GMT
Written by: AlertNet
Boys pan for gold on a riverside at Iga Barriere, 25 km (15 miles) from Bunia in eastern Congo. <BR>REUTERS/Finbarr O'Reilly
Boys pan for gold on a riverside at Iga Barriere, 25 km (15 miles) from Bunia in eastern Congo.
REUTERS/Finbarr O'Reilly

Congo's bloody conflicts are often dubbed "resource wars" - wars that are fuelled and motivated by control over the country's vast natural mineral deposits.

In eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, armed groups responsible for vicious rapes and other atrocities against civilians are reported to use revenues from illegal taxation of minerals to fund their activities.

So surely any attempt to choke off the economic drivers of the war should be applauded.

Some say it's not quite that simple, however.

Two blogs on AlertNet take differing views on how best to tackle a conflict that has killed more than 5.4 million people in the past decade, more than any other war since World War Two.

Anti-genocide group Enough argues that cutting the cord between the minerals trade and local rebel groups is essential to undermining the economic base that keeps the eastern Congo's conflict running.

With sufficient consumer demand on electronics manufacturers to account for where minerals used in mobile phones and laptops originate, financing of the most flagrant rights abusers could be stemmed, Enough says.

And creating transparent supply chains and reforming the mining sector are the first vital steps towards altering the conflict economy in Congo, it argues.

Taking a somewhat different view is consultancy group Resource Consulting Services, which argues that such well-intentioned steps could do more harm than good to Congo's poor.

They say some rebel groups have adequate economic alternatives to continue their campaigns of violence even without profits from minerals.

Further, they argue that efforts to regulate the minerals trade would be a logistical nightmare that could hurt desperately poor Congolese miners with few other ways to make a living.

Both blogs raise complicated and important issues. Tell us what you think. What's the link between minerals and Congo's conflict? Who would be hurt most by attempts to regulate this trade - armed groups or Congo's most destitute?

And what exactly needs to be done to stop the bloody cycle of violence that has plagued the country for years?

Please leave your thoughts at the bottom of the page.

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.


Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Tue Apr 21 14:07:30 2009