Will climate change war cry fall on deaf ears?
Written by: Megan Rowling

A woman works in a paddy field in India's fragile Sunderbans region. REUTERS/Parth Sanyal
You can hardly move for VIPs at the Global Humanitarian Forum meeting on "the human face of climate change" in Geneva this week. The participants range from wealthy businessmen like Richard Branson to the president of the Maldives and the heads of practically every U.N. agency going. But the stars of the show so far have been a group of youngsters who gave powerful testimonies about the impact of climate change on their own lives and their communities. Their stories are the reason why 300 or so eminent people have gathered in Switzerland for a rather swish two-day brainstorm in an air-conditioned luxury hotel. As 17-year-old Rishika Das Roy from Kolkata pleaded, "Please make this conference worth its carbon footprint!" She spoke about how rising sea levels are swamping the low-lying islands and homes of India's fragile Sunderbans region, leaving growing numbers without land or enough food. "How will we feed these environmental refugees? Will you welcome an extra 70,000 people from vanishing islands? I think not!" she said. Indeed, how to deal with migration spurred by climate change is a sticky issue, because no one has legal responsibility to look after people displaced by environmental factors. Later when I asked the U.N. refugee commissioner, Antonio Guterres, how he thought this issue should be dealt with, he was cautious, saying only that there was a need for an international debate to decide on the best way to protect and assist those who don't fit the traditional definition of a refugee. I'm not sure Das Roy would have been satisfied with that answer. Nor would the other young people who joined her on the stage at the opening session on Tuesday. Jesse Mike, a young Inuk woman from Nunavut in Canada, choked back tears while recounting how her friend had lost his life shortly after becoming a father when he went hunting on ice that was too thin for the season. She told the story of an elder whose legs had to be amputated after falling through ice, and described how her mother's community is disposing of sewage in the sea because they've been cut off from the outside world after their bridge collapsed due to melting permafrost. In a session later that morning on "climate justice in a shared global ecosphere", Jesse appealed to the panel to come up with some swift answers. "I have been to a lot of conferences and there has been a lot of talk and nothing has happened yet," she said. "So I'm asking you to act right now." James Bing N.C. III, an 18 year old student from the Marshall Islands in the Pacific, cut straight to the chase. "I am angry now," he told the assembled elite. "I have witnessed my island getting smaller and smaller. The rising sea level has taken our beaches, food and, most importantly, our soil. What have you done to it? I want my soil back!" He ended with a battle cry used by Pacific Island warriors. The testimony from the group of young people received a standing ovation. But whether or not the witnesses will get the immediate action they called for is far from certain. In the session on climate justice, U.N. climate change chief Yvo de Boer said international talks on a new pact to tackle global warming were suffering from "an unbelievable - almost criminal - lack of leadership". Afterwards, he told AlertNet he was disappointed with world leaders' reluctance to agree to mid-term goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. See the story. Forum president and former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan stated in the opening session that the aim of the gathering was to bring together different actors who don't normally work together, to overcome the humanitarian challenges facing the world. So did it look like they would really do much to speed up the rather glacial nature of international progress? To me, the first day of the two-day conference seemed a little short on new ideas (or perhaps that was because media weren't allowed to attend some of the most interesting brainstorming sessions on themes like climate change and conflict, food security, the role of insurance and innovative financing for adaptation). What shone through was a clear focus on the need for justice in the climate debate (that rich polluters have the responsibility to assist those most affected by their carbon profligacy), and support for the idea (proposed by the president of the Maldives) that environmental security should be treated as a human right. On the lighter side, one moderator suggested everyone at big meetings like this should stop wearing wool jackets so the air conditioner could be switched off. And development economist Jeffrey Sachs invited Richard Branson to venture into solar electricity generation in Africa's Sahel region, under the brand "Virgin Desert". He also argued that an international carbon tax would work better than an emissions trading system. Sachs made an impassioned plea for climate change not to be pigeon-holed as a problem that affects only marginalised communities in remote areas, reminding the audience of the current drought in California and floods in the west of the United States. "It is important not to take the view that this is about the poor - because if we do, it won't get solved," he said. "This is an issue about the whole world, and we need commitments from everybody." At the end of the day, delegates were asked to write down their name and favourite climate change "solution" on a piece of paper, before handing it in. And when James Bing was asked to repeat his war cry, it came as a humbling reminder that even they - some of the world's most influential people - remain some way off mobilising the level of political will needed to answer the young participants' call for immediate action.
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
1 response to “Will climate change war cry fall on deaf ears?”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.
30 Jun 2008 07:30:41 GMT
I always believe that energy saving, along with other major reform strategies, starts at home, with the sigle individual.
A simple example If everybody in the world leaves one grain of rice on their plate, this amounts to 6 billion grains of rice. How many kilograms is this? According to the "Wiki Answers" in the Internet: How many grains of rice are in a one kilogram bag of normal rice? Answer: There are an average of 36,590 rice grains in a Kilogram and 1,829,500 grains in a 50 Kg bag. ============================ Simple mathematics scientifically shows that if everybody in the world leaves only one grain of rice on their plate, 163,979 kg of rice, which could feed the poor, would be thrown away. If one portion of rice is 100 grams, this means that the rice thrown away would have given 1,630,000 people a portion of rice a day. Since food requires water, land and energy sources to be produced and discarded of... the consequences can be imagined without much effort. ============================= What can we do to help the planet? It's quite simple: LET'S NOT THROW FOOD AWAY!!! Rosanna Faillace