Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
U.N. squirms over case of mistaken worm identity
04 Feb 2009 15:16:00 GMT
Written by: Megan Rowling
Is it an army worm or an Achaea catocaloides caterpillar? <br>
In this photo, it's army worms that are munching maize leaves in a Kenyan garden back in May 1999.  
<BR>REUTERS/George Mulala
Is it an army worm or an Achaea catocaloides caterpillar?
In this photo, it's army worms that are munching maize leaves in a Kenyan garden back in May 1999.
REUTERS/George Mulala

Around two weeks ago, the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) first raised the alarm that a caterpillar infestation in Liberia could turn into a regional emergency affecting other countries in West Africa.

Initially the insects were suspected to be highly destructive army worms, which bore up to 5 cm (2 inches) into the ground to pupate before turning into moths that can fly as far as 1,000 km (620 miles).

The government declared a national emergency and the invading caterpillars are thought to have affected the crops and houses of some half a million people.

On Jan. 29, the FAO issued a second press release saying it was leading a team of international experts "racing against time to contain a vast plague of voracious army worm caterpillars", to prevent them spreading across the region. At that stage, the U.N. agency seemed pretty certain of their identity.

But on Tuesday it emerged the insects were not army worms after all but of the Achaea catocaloides species. Like army worms, they too eat vegetation, including cocoa trees, which could be a threat to plantations in West Africa if the conditions remain conducive for reproduction, the scientist who identified the pests told Reuters.

The caterpillars have spread to Guinea and could be a threat to farmers in neighbouring Ivory Coast, which is the world's top cocoa grower.

Yet in a press release on Wednesday, the FAO appeared to water down its warning of a dire regional emergency, saying the threat of future outbreaks could be contained more easily than thought.

It said a key difference between the two types of insect is that those now rampaging across Liberia actually spin their cocoons on the ground under fallen leaves. As a result, they are less difficult to destroy than army worms and their spread can be limited.

The FAO said its team in the field had seen villagers stamping on the cocoons, and collecting and burning them, although this couldn't entirely stop them spreading.

Also on the positive side, while the caterpillars have polluted water supplies and damaged some crops like coffee, cocoa, plantain and bananas, the FAO said staple food crops - including maize, rice, sorghum and millet - have generally been spared. That's likely to ease fears of the infestation causing a widespread food emergency.

Nonetheless, the FAO warned the government isn't prepared for further outbreaks, and said the current infestation offered an opportunity to develop a better response system against pests.

AlertNet can't help wondering whether the FAO might be feeling a little embarrassed that it jumped on the army worm bandwagon a little too soon, and put out a rather alarmist message in the early days of the outbreak.

In Wednesday's statement, the U.N. agency said the international field team in which its scientists participated had established that "the insects were not army worms, as had been reported, but larvae of another moth species".

That rather fudges the FAO's own assertion last week that the insects were indeed army worms.

In its Jan. 29 press release, it noted the insects were behaving in a way that was atypical of army worms by living in tall trees, but said its permanent representative in Liberia, Winfred Hammond, was sure that's what they were.

"In fact, he initially doubted they could be army worms, one of the most destructive of insect pests, but positively identified them as such in tests last week," read the release. Not only this but it added the caterpillars had been burrowing into the ground and devouring all vegetation in their path.

That information is at odds with what's presented in the latest FAO press release. Perhaps some kind of explanation is in order?

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.

Before joining AlertNet, Megan Rowling worked as a freelance print and television journalist in Britain, France and Japan. At AlertNet, she focuses on the humanitarian impact of climate change. In 2008, she also spent several months working part-time as a media relations officer for the British Red Cross. She recently completed an MSc in development management.
Blogroll Reuters Environment Blog
Dot Earth (Andrew C. Revkin, New York Times)
oDToday (openDemocracy)
Guatemala Solidarity Network: the blog
Conor Foley (comment is free...)
Uganda's Scarlett Lion

Latest bloggers

More bloggers
Israel: Hamas Raids UN Aid in Gaza

Ethiopia: The Boy Without Arms

South Korea: Protest Against Police Violence at Yongsan

Afghanistan: Detour Dispatches

Rohingya Muslims facing cultural genocide



Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Wed Feb 4 15:22:35 2009