Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
Hong Kong: Vindication of June 4 in Question
22 Mar 2009 06:33:05 GMT
Written by: Global Voices
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.
GlobalVoices
2009 is the 20th anniversary of June 4 Tiananmen Massacre. If there were reincarnation, people who had been killed then would be twenty years old this year. Some of them would probably become university students, who are usually regarded as conscience of the society. However sadly this year, at least two university student unions in Hong Kong want to distant themselves away from the “burden” of upholding the political stand in “Vindication of June 4″.

Yuen Yan wrote a citizen report in inmediahk.net about the City University of Hong Kong Students' Union Council's decision to bar the Student Press for distributing pamphlets in the upcoming June 4 Candle night Vigil because the action would imply a political stand in support of the “Vindication of June 4″.

According to Yuen Yan's report, the Student Council has spent 5 to 6 hours in the budget meeting on the publication of “June 4 special issue”. Members opposed the distribution of pamphlet in the Candle night vigil; below is a summary of the members' opinions:

1. 六四事件å'ŒåŸŽå¤§å­¸ç"Ÿç„¡é-œä¿‚,尤其質ç–'ç·¨å§"在六四燭光晚會上公開派發特刊,是拿城大學ç"Ÿæœƒæœƒè²»ï¼Œæ´¥è²¼å­¸ç"Ÿä»¥å¤–的活動;
2. ç·¨å§"出版的刊物無權到校外派發。評議å"¡ç¨±åƒèˆ‡å…­å››ç‡­å…‰é›†æœƒæ˜¯ç"±åŸŽå¤§å­¸ç"Ÿæœƒå¹¹äº‹æœƒè² è²¬ï¼Œç·¨å§"會不可以參與當中活動;
3. 把《六四特刊》在燭光晚會上派發有可能煽動在場參與人士,引起混亂;
4. 建議在æ-ºè§'è¡-頭派發特刊,這樣æ¯"在六四燭光集會派更有意義;
5. 出版《六四特刊》會影響城大聲譽;
6. 六四燭光晚會是一個有æ"¿æ²»ç«‹å ´çš„聚會,在六四燭光集會派發特刊等於æ"¯æŒå¹³åå…­å››ã€‚

1. The City University Student Union has nothing to do with the June 4 incident, the distribution of student pamphlet during the candle night vigil implies using city university student union's money to sponsor non-student related activities;
2. The student press has not rights to distribute publication outside the school. The student union executive committee is in charge of June 4 Candle night vigil, while the student press has not role in it;
3. The distribution of “June 4 special issue” will invite people to join in the vigil, it is a seditious act and will create chaos;
4. One of the suggestion is to distribute the “Special Issue” in Mongkok pedestrian district instead of during the candle night vigil;
5. The publication of “June 4 special issue” would after the university's reputation;
6. June 4 Candle night is a political gathering and distributing the “special issue” during the candle night would be equal to the support of “vindication of June 4″.
After the discussion, a member proposed to cast an opinion vote and 9 out of the 10 attendees opposed the distribution of “June 4 special issue” and the student press was forced to withdraw this particular budget item in order to get their annual budget passed.

At the same time, the Hong Kong University Student Union will initiate a campus referendum vote on whether or not the Student Union should continue to uphold the stand of “vindication of June 4″. Galileo pointed out in the comment section of Yuen Yan's report:

但有點要留意係,同香港大學搞平反六四公投一樣,內地ç"Ÿæ¯"例現在已ç¶"夠高,未必過到。

We also have to bear in mind about the HKU student union's referendum vote on Vindication of June 4. As the proportion of mainland students is getting higher and higher, there is a chance that the referendum cannot be passed.
Within a few hours, the discussion has spread through inmediahk.net, twitter, plurk and facebook. Sidekick re-tweeted my message and received more than a hundred responses in a few hours:

RT oiwan: 慢慢地,平反六四不再是共識了。。。香港真係恐怖:www.inmediahk.net/node/1002676

RT oiwan: slowly, vindication of June 4 will no longer be a consensus, it is really terrible: www.inmediahk.net/node/1002676

剛才未讀文章。單看 oiwan 那句,æˆ'即心酸å¾-流起淚來…

I haven't read the article yet, but reading what oiwan had said, my heart was so hurt that tears came out…

其實現在應該要做的,不只是單單的平反,而是要有機會搵外人去跟雙方做truth & reconciliation。不過一定要在æˆ'å€'這一代要完成,否則歷史會ç¿'非成是,永遠無法æ'¥äº‚反正,如西班牙佛æœ-å"¥æ­»å¾Œ…

What we should do now is not only vindication, but find a third party to do truth & reconciliation. However, we have to get it done within this generation, or else the truth of history will turn upside down and we can't correct it. Like what had happened in Spain after the death of General Franco…

其實æˆ'覺å¾-最恐怖 (古怪) 的是, 內地當權者對六四是越來越開æ"¾çš„ (æˆ'覺å¾-), 反而香港 (尤其是基層, 例如å'¢d 學校oæ-¢çµ„ç¹") 就越o黎越保守… 真係發神ç¶"!

What I find most terrible and strange is that when the ruling elites in Mainland is getting more open with June 4 (my feeling), in Hong Kong, in particular in the grassroots level, such as school organizations, they are becoming more and more conservative, it is really crazy!

最怕是,學ç"Ÿé‡è¦–個人利益,並認同國家,最終令到他å€'有意無意的忽視、無視、ç"šè‡³æ›²è§£é€™ç­‰ã€Œé»'歷史」

What is most fearful is that students only care about their personal interest and recognize with the state, eventually, they will ignore or even twist the “black history”.

叫佢地對住丁子霖講多一次!

Ask them to repeat their points in front of Ding Zilin!

有ç"Ÿä¹‹å¹´ï¼Œæˆ'å€'會看到å-Žï¼Ÿé€™ä¸æ˜¯å–®å–®çš„平反,而係要查根究柢去了結。

Will we see this in our life span? This is not only vindication, but a throughout investigation.

六四是包袱還是傳承æˆ'å€'自己還要質ç–'?人權å'Œè‡ªç"±å'Œå¹³ç­‰é€™äº›åŽŸå‰‡åˆæ˜¯ä¸æ˜¯åŒ…è¢±ï¼Ÿ

June 4 as a burden or legacy? Do we really need to debate on this? Should we consider human rights and freedom as burden then?

所以,中共已ç¶"離全æ°'æ´-腦又一步了……

The CCP is one step forward to brainwashing the entire population…

æˆ'對å'¢ç¨®äº‹æƒ…感覺好無力, 就好似一d 老人家,ç"šæˆ–è‡ªå·±æ-¢çˆ¶æ¯, 佢地對六四ç"±å§‹è‡³çµ‚都係冇感覺, 但æˆ'一直認為, 社會起碼還有智識æ-¢äºº, 佢地正尋求一d 物質以外更重要æ-¢é‡Ž, 自ç"±, 人權等等…但當年死æ-¢ä¿‚大學ç"Ÿ, 現在話å""é-œä½¢åœ°äº‹æ-¢éƒ½ä¿‚大學ç"Ÿ…到底發ç"Ÿå·¦å'©äº‹

I feel so powerless toward these kind of issues, as if I am an oldie. Even my parent don't share the feeling towards June 4. However, I believe that people with knowledge in this society are seeking values like freedom and human rights rather than material interests… back then, university students died for that, now university students say that it is not their concern, what happens to our society?

如果六四距離太遠,2003年的沙士å'Œä¸ƒä¸€å¤§éŠè¡Œç†æ‡‰æ˜¯é€™ä¸€ä»£æœ€” 埋身”çš„æ"¿æ²»ç¶"歷了,然而,在æ"¿çš„的大力過濾下,距離不夠七年的沙士竟也變成某些人口中的” 有人煽動”,還有人敢在說是”外國勢力

If June 4 is too far away, the SARS epidemic attack and the July 1 rally in 2003 should be the closest experience to this generation, however, because of the political pressure and filter, the chaos of SARS less than 7 years ago has turned into a “sedition” of “foreign power”.

所以大家可以做好心理準備,六四將來會成為一個完全æ°'é–"的活動,很缺錢,很å°'報導,但æˆ'å€'一定會為這件事拼死的做。

We have to be prepared that in the future, June 4 would become a purely civic event, without financial support, and without much media attention. But we will get it done.
ç•¶, “平反六四” 只係30+ oæ-¢äººåš, å'ç•¶d 人死鬼æ™', 又或在社會各階層都不在其位時, 又點ç®-å'¢?

If “vindication of June 4″ is only taken up by 30+ generation, when they are dead or they are excluded from significant social position, what then?
教育? 香港大概已ç¶"不能起æ"¿æ²»æ•™è‚²çš„地方吧, ç"šè‡³ç¨ç«‹æ€è€ƒçš„æ•™è‚²éƒ½åšä¸ä¾†…. 但æˆ'地現在æ-¢è¨Žè«–, 最å°'就係æˆ'地做到的事, æˆ'地的的確確更深刻å'è¨˜ä½å•Š

Education? Hong Kong has totally failed in political education, we can't even educate people to think independently… this kind of discussion is the least that we can do, we have to remember this.
Below is a BBC live report on June 4 incident for refreshing our memory:

View original post.

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
GlobalVoices

We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content in this article, including by framing or by similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.


Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Sun Mar 22 07:09:02 2009