A time of cholera in Southern Sudan
Written by: Joanne Offer
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.

A girl washes her face at a borehole built by IRC in Aweil. IRC photo
I'm standing outside a typical village church. But today its mud walls and thatched roof are offering a different kind of sanctuary - it's being used as a makeshift centre to treat suspected cholera patients from the surrounding area. Inside, three women lie on mats on the dirt floor. They're hooked up to IV drips and seem to be making a good recovery, but I'm told that a young boy died here last night. His body went into convulsions because he didn't have enough fluids in his system. There was nothing the local nurse could do. To me it seems a great tragedy, a little boy killed by a disease that we know both how to prevent and how to cure. But I can tell from the faces around me that this boy isn't the first and certainly won't be the last casualty in a country still struggling to rebuild its health service after years of civil war. I'm in a small village called Peth, about an hour and a half's drive from Aweil town in Northern Bahr El-Ghazal, Southern Sudan. The population is growing rapidly as people return home after the peace agreement of 2005. But there's still no health centre here, so the local nurse is reliant on emergency supplies and support from the International Rescue Committee (IRC). Thankfully, the number of cases appears to be manageable - about 30 over the weekend - and there are far fewer patients today than yesterday. The problem is that cholera spreads via water and this village sits right on the River Lol, which is taking the disease towards other villages and towns where awareness about even the most rudimentary of hygiene practices is low. I feel that what I'm seeing here in Peth is indicative of a larger problem. As more and more people return to Southern Sudan, the most essential of basic services just aren't there to cope, despite the young government's best efforts. Over the course of a week, I've visited villages where a handful of boreholes serve hundreds of people, and other places where there isn't a single latrine. It's often hard to explain to Westerners - or others used to running water and flushing toilets - quite how bad this makes things. Sanitation isn't the most sexy of topics, I know, but it really is a serious problem. If people have to use the bush, when the rains come everything is washed into rivers and uncovered wells, where the same people will collect their drinking water. The health problems this causes are obvious. Back in Aweil town, I find out that the civilian hospital has seen more than 90 cases of cholera and witnessed at least two deaths. I'm amazed/appalled to hear that cholera can severely dehydrate and kill an adult in only four hours. Four hours! But I'm reassured to hear that there are simple steps communities can take to prevent it. For example, in the east of Aweil, I meet volunteers who are busy chlorinating water from a local borehole. Women and children fill their jerry cans and then queue up to let the volunteers put a few drops of chlorine inside. It's amazingly quick, simple and cheap. Just 3ml can treat a 20-litre jerry can and give a family water that's cholera-free. When you consider the alternative, you can't put a price on it.
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
1 response to “A time of cholera in Southern Sudan”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content in this article, including by framing or by similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.
30 Dec 2008 12:44:25 GMT
I thought there was some medical aid in Sudan. It seems that there still some lack in water in the area. Is cholera really rampant there in Sudan? I have been visiting the The Emma Academy Project, and I think that building a school with a complete set of facilities there in Leer, Sudan, would really benefit the people there.