Thu, 6 Nov 13:19:55 GMT17

 
Civilians suffer as Pakistan army targets Taliban
01 Oct 2008 15:55:00 GMT
Written by: Mustafa Qadri
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.
A child from Bajaur eats scraps of rice next to an empty bowl. Photo by Mustafa Qadri
A child from Bajaur eats scraps of rice next to an empty bowl. Photo by Mustafa Qadri

For civilians in Pakistan's conflict-ridden tribal areas, the Taliban are not the only threat.

The Taliban insurgency along Pakistan's tribal border with Afghanistan has fast turned into the key security concern for the United States.

The Taliban stands accused of committing several atrocities. In the former resort area of Swat, the Taliban has destroyed over a hundred girls schools this year alone.

Suicide attacks on major Pakistani cities have become a weekly occurrence, most recently during a gun battle at a hideout in Karachi last week.

The Sept. 20 Islamabad Marriot bombing, timed to coincide with President Asif Ali Zardari's inaugural speech to parliament, killed up to 70 and injured hundreds more. It was perhaps the most ferocious Taliban attack to date.

Strict applications of sharia - or Islamic law - in areas controlled by the Taliban such as Waziristan have resulted in further casualties; several people found guilty of committing crimes have been executed, flogged or have had limbs amputated.

Less widely reported, however, is the increasing number of civilian casualties caused by Pakistan army operations.

Precise figures are difficult to obtain. Independent observers, mostly based on media reports, believe around 300 civilians have been killed by military operations in 2008.

Jamaat-e-Islami, a religious political party that provides humanitarian assistance to civilians in the conflict-ridden tribal agencies, estimates that around 1,500 civilians have been killed.

According to the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR), around 310,000 people have been displaced from regions with a Taliban presence.

Analysts cite the inability to distinguish friend from foe as a key reason for the high civilian death toll.

"There are three main groups of fighters," said Farrukh Saleem from the Centre for Research and Security Studies.

"First are the Taliban from Afghanistan. They, along with Al Qaeda, are using Pakistan as a sanctuary. Then there are the local, Pakistani Taliban who want to create their own Islamic state in Pakistan. The third are tribal militias who, due to local politics and considerations, have decided to support the Taliban."

This third category of tribal militias changes its allegiances often depending upon the situation on the ground. Sometimes they fight alongside the Pakistan army. At other times they remain neutral.

Confusion over whom particular tribes support may have contributed to some of the civilian casualties caused by Pakistan army operations.

Yet some believe the Pakistan army deliberately targets civilians perceived to be sympathetic to the Taliban or local political groups.

That is certainly the sentiment among displaced people in camps throughout the North-West Frontier Province.

In the hamlet of Timagara, at the foothills of conflict-ridden Bajaur, displaced villagers live in basic camps without electricity or running water and limited access to food. They recount shocking stories of civilians being attacked by the Pakistan Army.

"On the second day of Ramadan (3 September) the bombardment started again," recalled Haji Mohammad Noor Khan, a community elder from the Baramamond near Kunar province Afghanistan district of Bajaur.

At the beginning of the fasting month of Ramadan, on 2 September, Pakistan Adviser on Interior Rehman Malik announced a ceasefire of hostilities between the army and militants. Bajauri civilians fleeing the conflict were told it was safe to return to their homes.

But many who decided to make the journey back to their villages said they found themselves the target of Pakistan army mortars and helicopter gunships.

"It was very clear. They would bomb the civilians (and) not the suspected Taliban hideouts," said Misael Khan, another village elder. "The Taliban have (clearly identifiable) utility vehicles, yet the army always targets our civilian buses. They cut our electricity but not the Taliban's... Actually I think they are afraid of (attacking) them."

Another man in the camp, who declined to be identified, said: "The bombardment left huge craters, each around 20 feet wide. People talk about (the violence in) Afghanistan and India, but what about us? We are being targeted like foreign invaders. We fear the Taliban too (but) not even they target civilians in this way."

Displaced villagers in Peshawar cite Pakistan army attacks on civilians as the primary reason for their decision to leave.

"We were buying sweets for Eid when a helicopter came and fired at a car," said Nasir Khan from Bajaur. "It was totally destroyed. I think (the blast) killed people in the market too... I didn't wait to find out. I left yesterday evening with my family."

The allegations have been corroborated by former Pakistan soldiers. One such soldier is 22 year old Farooq, who fought with the paramilitary Swat Scouts.

"We were ordered to fire mortars on unarmed civilians... I don't know how many (civilians) I might have killed. It is still happening now," he recalled, visibly shaken.

"They are killing men, women, children, everyone... I said, enough, I won't kill anymore."

The Pakistan army vehemently denies these allegations.

"Of course, such allegations are false," said Pakistan Army spokesperson Lt-Col. Baseer Haider at the Pakistan Army Headquarters in Rawalpindi. "We do not target civilians. Our writ is to remove the extremists... and bring order."

Yet the claims come at a time when Pakistan authorities are boasting they have killed 1,000 militants in September in one offensive alone near the Afghan border at Bajaur. It is unclear whether the figure includes civilians suspected of supporting pro-Taliban militias.

But even if civilians have not been deliberately targeted, authorities are struggling to cope with the humanitarian repercussions of the conflict. On 23 September, UNHCR announced that it needed $17 million to help those displaced by war and flooding in Pakistan's conflict-ridden northwest.

On the same day as the UNCHR announcement, five people were killed by police in the Swat district of North-West Frontier Province during a series of protests against the lack of basic necessities like electricity and the inability of authorities to protect civilians and property from army and Taliban attacks.

The deaths prompted the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan to issue a press release demanding that authorities do more to safeguard civilians.

Those demands may be falling on deaf years. This weekend, local media carried reports that Swat was on the verge of complete civil disorder. Other tribal agencies may soon follow.

If that occurs, Pakistan, and the world, will have more than just religious extremists to contend with. They may face a full scale insurrection by disaffected communities uprooted by war.

"Our people have fought and died for Pakistan in all of its wars," said Noor Khan, a village elder from Bajaur now living in the displaced persons camp at Timagara. "But not anymore."

Some of the names in this report have been changed to protect their identity.

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

4 responses to “Civilians suffer as Pakistan army targets Taliban”

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
  1. Peter says:

    Tell me something new... Civilians are always the victim in armed conflicts. A very sad truth!!!

    And the poorer they are, the less options they have to move, or to protest, or to speak up...

  2. Jon says:

    This underlines the fact that whether or not citizens are willing to admit it, Pakistan is in the midst of a civil war. It has tolerated foreign elements inside its borders for MANY years and is now reaping the results of providing sanctuary to these elements.

    It is indeed very sad the normal Pakistanis are forced to bear the brunt of a problem that its leaders have allowed to grow.

  3. marta says:

    I sometimes wonder if useing the name, Taiban is giving others the Excuse to invade?

  4. jan Bernhardt says:

    This was a situation l was not aware of and my prayers and love go out to these refugee in this horrid time they are going through l wonder where their leaders compassion and brains are

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content in this article, including by framing or by similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.

Mustafa Qadri is an Australian-based freelance journalist who has worked in the Middle East, Britain and Pakistan. He was formerly a lawyer specialising in public and international law with the Australian Attorney-General's Department and the Pilbara Native Title Service. He writes mainly about Middle East and South Asian politics.

Latest bloggers




URL: http://www.alertnet.org/db/blogs/54127/2008/09/1-155515-1.htm

For our full disclaimer and copyright information please visit http://www.alertnet.org