Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login
Burma: One Year After Cyclone Nargis
01 May 2009 19:53:00 GMT
Written by: Refugees International
Reuters and AlertNet are not responsible for the content of this article or for any external internet sites. The views expressed are the author's alone.

Anniversaries provide us with many opportunities – to commemorate, to remember, to admonish, to celebrate, to reassess. Tomorrow is the one year anniversary of Cyclone Nargis, which destroyed 700,000 homes in the Irrawaddy Delta of Burma and killed an estimated 138,000 people. In the press releases that I’ve read in the past few days, a number of organizations are using this anniversary to chastise the Burmese regime for their callousness towards their own population. This is undeniable, but I want to argue that this anniversary should be used for a different purpose – to see what we can do to continue to help the people who suffered from the storm.

Despite the Burmese regime’s abhorrent response to the cyclone in the opening weeks, humanitarian aid workers eventually gained unprecedented access to the disaster zone. Millions of people have been helped, but many still need more assistance to build permanent housing, access clean water, and purchase equipment for fishing and agriculture. Shortly after Cyclone Nargis stopped becoming front page news, funding for activities like these began to slow down. On a recent mission to Burma in February this year, I found that agencies were concerned that they may have to scale back or even shut down their operations in the delta because funding was so limited.

Aid to Burma is even more urgent now.  Even though many Burmese have made impressive gains in their recovery, the global economic crisis has complicated this process. In February, we found that farmers who were able to successfully harvest the last rice crop thanks to international aid are having difficulty selling it, as market prices are roughly 30% lower than last year. As a result, they may not earn enough money to buy seed and fertilizers for the next planting season, which begins soon. Similarly, fishermen who have received new boats thanks to international assistance have seen the market for their catch disappear, as prices dropped 30 to 40% in the past year. The international community must realize that helping people get back on their feet takes time and long-term commitment. That means continuing to fund the Cyclone recovery.

The new Obama Administration is giving indications that it will include a commitment to humanitarian assistance to Burma as part of its current policy review. This would be the first time that the U.S. is willing to make a long-term commitment to helping the people of Burma meet their daily needs. However, Congress holds the purse strings, and getting the US to make a meaningful contribution will be difficult.  To date, the US has committed $75 million to the cyclone relief effort – we were the second largest donor to the disaster, and that should be applauded.  However, when we compare the contribution in 2008 to the budget for 2009, funding has dropped 75% in just a year to $15 million. We need to show that we are serious about this policy and put our money where our mouth is – the budget for 2010 should be doubled to $30 million.

Anniversaries being what they are, Burma will quickly fade to the back pages of most people’s agendas, if it makes it on to the agenda at all.  But it is up to the policymakers in Washington and other capitals around the world to make sure that, when we remember the horrible suffering that Cyclone Nargis dealt to the Burmese people last year, that we become part of the solution year round. 

-Jake Kurtzer
Refugees International

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content in this article, including by framing or by similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.

Refugees International, a U.S-based aid agency, generates lifesaving humanitarian assistance and protection for displaced people around the world, and works to end the conditions that create displacement. The organisation was founded in 1979.

Latest bloggers

More bloggers
China: Children who are left behind

Afghanistan: Counting the cost of war

Mongolia: Edurelief project “Laptops for Teachers”

Yemen: A Civil or Proxy War?

China: Death as business



Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Mon Nov 30 16:40:05 2009