
![]() Alerting humanitarians to emergencies |
| About AlertNet | Why join AlertNet? | Help |

More than four decades of conflict have turned Colombia into one of the world's worst humanitarian hotspots, with millions caught up in the crossfire between soldiers, leftist rebels, cocaine smugglers and far-right paramilitary militias.
| Displaced people | 1.9-3.9 million by mid 2007 | Colombian government lower estimate, human rights group CODHES higher estimate |
| Kidnappings | 486 in 2007 | Vice President's Office |
| 687 in 2006 | Vice President's Office | |
| 800 in 2005 | Vice President's Office | |
| 1,440 in 2004 | Vice President's Office | |
| Land cultivated with coca | More than 10 percent (2007) | U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime |
| Landmine casualties | 1,106 killed or injured in 2006 | Landmine Monitor 2007 |

A hefty portion of Colombian cocaine ends up on the streets of the United States, and the U.S. government gives heavy backing to Colombia's war on drugs, fuelling controversy among rights activists and environmentalists.
Colombian villagers often come under heavy pressure to turn to one armed group or another for protection, but are then vulnerable to reprisal attacks and massacres.
Indigenous peoples make up just one percent of the population, but live in 27 of the country's 32 departments. UNHCR says there is a real threat of extinction for tribes such as the Wounaan who live in Choco near Colombia's northern border with Panama and the Nukaks who live in the southeastern department of Guaviarre.
Other peoples under threat are the Awa, Kofan, Siona, Paez, Coreguaje, Carijona, Guayabero, Muinane-Bora, Pasto, Embera and Witoto.
In this highly militarised countryside, civilians suffer a heavy toll from landmines, giving Colombia one of the world's highest landmine casualty rates.
In 2006, Colombia topped the table for landmine deaths and injuries with a total of 1,106, according to the Landmine Monitor, followed by Afghanistan with 488 and Pakistan with 796.

This isn't a straightforward two-sided war between government and revolutionaries, and it doesn't even divide neatly between left and right on the political spectrum, although politics is certainly an element of it.
Marxist rebels have been fighting to overthrow the Colombian government since the mid-1960s. While the guerrillas have changed considerably in many ways, the inequalities that originally fuelled revolt and attracted people to the cause haven't changed much.
The country's elite is drawn primarily from descendants of the Spanish, while people of mixed heritage - indigenous, African and European - tend to be less well off, and 18 percent of Colombia's population of 44 million live on less than $2 a day, according to the U.N. Development Report for 2007-2008.
Despite undeniable inequalities in land and wealth distribution, the guerrillas don't command much popular support, especially in urban Colombia, where the U.N. Population Division says more than 72 percent of the population lives.
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) is the larger guerrilla organisation, with around 10,000 to 11,000 fighters, according to analysts at International Crisis Group. It dominates a third of the country, with a strong presence in jungle regions in the south and east.
However, it's got significantly weaker since losing a series of top commanders, and hundreds have deserted from its ranks prompted by military pressure and government rewards.
FARC started as a group of Marxist revolutionaries, but became heavily involved in the drugs trade to fund its activities, and grew fat on cocaine money in the 1990s.
FARC has shown little interest in peace talks. It has repeatedly called for the government to remove troops from a vast rural area before it starts talks on exchanging jailed rebels for hostages.
President Alvaro Uribe believes the rebels would use a demilitarised zone to regroup and rearm as they did in the late 1990s when former President Andres Pastrana agreed to pull troops out of a jungle area the size of Switzerland. But he has offered a smaller haven under international observation in an area where there are no armed forces or armed groups.
Several kidnap victims were released in early 2008 after Venezuelan-brokered deals, the first time FARC had freed high-profile hostages.
Ingrid Betancourt, captured while campaigning to be president in 2002, was freed by the Colombian military in July 2008, along with a dozen others.
FARC still has scores of other hostages, some of whom have been held for more than a decade.
Peace overtures have been slightly more successful with the National Liberation Army (ELN), whose strongholds are primarily in northwestern Colombia near the Venezuelan border.
The ELN was formed by radical students and Catholic priests inspired by the Cuban revolution, and was heavily influenced by Liberation Theology, a radical form of Latin American Catholicism which flourished in the 1960s but was heavily suppressed throughout the continent.
The ELN rejects drug trafficking but is not above kidnapping to raise funds. It attacks oil pipelines and electrical pylons. It is much smaller than FARC, with about 2,200 to 2,500 rebels, according to International Crisis Group.
Observers say FARC and the ELN rarely work together, and compete for local support in some areas, but they don't often clash directly.
In the mid-1960s, and again in the 1980s, landowners set up vigilante groups to protect themselves and their property from the ELN and FARC. These evolved into brutal paramilitary organisations with their own hierarchical structures, and have also become heavily involved in the lucrative drugs trade.
The last members of the United Self-Defence Forces of Colombia (AUC) - the largest paramilitary organisation, with 30,000 members - handed in their weapons in 2006, under a deal with the government promising them freedom in civilian life or reduced jail sentences for crimes including murder in return for confessions and the return of illegal goods.
Once-semi-secret connections between the paramilitaries and the political establishment have been thrust into the limelight since former militia leaders started giving evidence about their high-profile friends.
The AUC, FARC and ELN are all designated terrorist organisations by the United States, and the Colombian army attracted U.S. support - military backing and training - during the Cold War for its anti-communist crusade.

The United Nations and many analysts say the demobilisation has not ended the AUC's influence or dismantled its criminal and cocaine-smuggling operations.
There are also several thousand other far-right paramilitaries who are not AUC members and have yet to hand in their weapons. Worse still, Belgian-based think tank International Crisis Group says the void left by demobilising groups who protected drug operations has created a demand for new illegal armed structures with names like "Black Eagles" and "New Generation", which are already recruiting ex-combatants.
The Organisation of American States said in a 2007 report that 22 new organisations had up to 3,000 members.
President Uribe came to power on a pledge to wipe out the insurgency, and initially showed little sign of compromise, launching the "Patriot Plan" in 2004 in a renewed crackdown on guerrillas and an attempt to break FARC's strength in southern Colombia.
Uribe promoted new legislation - the Justice and Peace Law - which came into force in July 2005, providing for the demobilisation of combatants, help for them to make the transition to civilian life, and compensation for victims of war crimes.
Under the new law, Justice and Peace Units are responsible for trying ex-militia members.
There's a separate National Commission for Reparation and Reconciliation. According to International Crisis Group, "Its priorities are discovering the truth regarding the death and disappearance of paramilitary victims, finding ways for reparation and paving the way for national reconciliation." The Catholic Church has independently compiled a confidential database of human rights violations.
However, rights activists say the law is weak and doesn't provide enough incentive for ex-combatants to confess, or give any guarantee that ex-combatants will really give up their weapons. They also say that women and children who worked with paramilitaries have been left out of peace deal benefits.
One of the reasons peace is so elusive is that life with the army or guerrillas or paramilitaries is a tempting career option for many poor people with scant options for making a living.
However flawed, most observers seem to agree the law is better than nothing.
Crisis Group says it will be hard for the government to comply with its commitment to compensate victims under the law. "To be blunt," a Crisis Group report says, "the law puts perpetrators first and victims second."

Colombia has been an important drug producer since the late 1970s, handling about 90 percent of the cocaine that ends up in the United States, according to U.S. government estimates.
Nearby Bolivia and Peru also grow coca - the plant that cocaine is made from - but there are some important differences. Firstly, coca leaves have some local cultural significance in these other countries, where they have been chewed for centuries as a stimulant that dulls hunger and decreases fatigue. This isn't the case in Colombia, where its production is almost entirely linked to the cocaine trade.
Secondly, Colombia not only grows the raw product, but processes it in clandestine hide-outs where environmentalists say toxic waste is dumped into the ground and pollutes water sources. Once it's on the way to becoming crack or cocaine, it's a far more potent drug, and the profit margin is far higher.
Colombia's drug traffickers have no scruples about kicking villagers off their land in order to turn it into new drug sites, and much of the trade is controlled by FARC and paramilitaries.
Since the armed groups get their income from drugs and kidnapping, they don't really need popular support, and they don't have much to gain from giving up their lucrative business.
The United States, which says Colombia is also a source of heroin, has weighed in heavily on the war on drugs, giving Colombia about $5.5 billion in aid since 2000. But critics say the U.S. assistance beefs up military operations which often have repressive effects on civilians. The Colombian government says aid just provides funds to escort its anti-narcotics operations.
A campaign to eradicate coca crops by aerial-spraying heavy-duty chemicals has had mixed results. The U.S. government says sprayed areas rarely come under cultivation the following year, but its own research shows that drug traffickers are constantly expanding into new zones, cutting down forests and displacing communities as they go.
The U.N. Office for Drugs and Crime said 99,000 hectares of Colombian land was being cultivated for coca in 2007. That's more than 10 percent of the country, equivalent to an area about the size of Cuba or South Korea.
Environmentalists are concerned about the environmental and health effects of spraying on non-drug crops and people who live in the areas, which include national parks.
Uribe is popular for cracking down on violence, which plagues Colombians from all walks of life. He won a second term in office in 2006 elections.
Violent crime has fallen considerably during Uribe's administration, but the figures still make sobering reading, with more than nine kidnappings every week.
"There is not a single person in Colombia that has not in one way or another been affected by the levels of violence in the country," Pierre Krahenbuhl, International Committee of the Red Cross director of operations, said in 2006.
The Vice President's Office says police recorded 486 kidnappings in 2007, compared to 687 in 2006. The 2006 total was an improvement on the 800 reported cases in 2005, and that, in turn, was a significant decrease from 2004, when there were 1,440 reported kidnappings.
A lot of kidnap victims don't make it home alive, even if their families pay a ransom. Many of the targets are fairly wealthy, since Colombia is a middle-income country with a substantial middle class and a sizeable elite living in relative luxury with armed guards in gated neighbourhoods.
But the poor are just as vulnerable to violent crime, in a country where the Vice President's Office says 17,198 people were murdered in 2007, down slightly from the 17,479 murders it claims for the previous year. The 2006 murder total was 17,281, a drop from 18,111 the previous year.
Despite the encouraging trend, Uribe has some critics among human rights organisations, who say his hardline approach infringes on human rights and sometimes tars trade unionists and community activists with the same brush as armed insurgents.
More than 4,000 trade union leaders have been assassinated since 1986, according to the U.S. State Department.
It's a risky country to be a journalist, too, with reporters frequently targeted for exposing corruption.
Rights campaigners also complain that the government's policies haven't stopped the need for people to flee danger in the countryside, or done anything to help hundreds of thousands of displaced people forced into near-destitution in urban slums.
Colombia has lived through periods of intense violence virtually since independence from Spain. The country's two main political parties - the Liberals and the Conservatives - were involved in bloody conflicts after their formation in the mid 19th century, even though their ideologies were almost indistinguishable.
Around 120,000 people died in "The War of a Thousand Days" between 1899 and 1903, and then another 300,000 people were killed in another period of civil conflict between 1948 and 1957.
After this, the two parties agreed to alternate power to end the battles and banned all other parties. The country has a democratic system now, but some analysts argue that Colombia has never known real democracy or rule of law, and that's one reason why it's so hard to achieve peace.
1948-1957 - Civil war kills 250,000 to 300,000 people
1949 - Galeras volcano kills 1,000 people
1958 - Civil war ended by a pact between rival political parties - Conservatives and Liberals - to alternate power
1964 - Left-wing guerrilla organisation Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) forms
1965 - National Liberation Army (ELN) formed by radical priests and students
1967 - Gabriel Garcia Marquez publishes epic novel One Hundred Years of Solitude, one of the seminal works of Latin American magical realism
1971 - Another left-wing guerrilla organisation, M-19, emerges
1982 - Gabriel Garcia Marquez wins Nobel Prize for Literature
1985 - About 22,000 people die when Nevado del Ruiz volcano erupts
1993 - Pablo Escobar, notorious leader of the infamous Medellín-based drugs cartel, killed trying to escape arrest
1989 - M-19 becomes legal political party
1999 - About 1,200 people killed by earthquake in town of Armenia
1999 - President Andres Pastrana Arango launches Plan Colombia, to eradicate drug production with U.S. financial and military assistance
2002
Presidential candidate Ingrid Betancourt taken hostage, later becomes a symbol of political kidnappings
President Alvaro Uribe takes office
2003 - Paramilitaries in United Self-Defence Forces of Colombia (AUC) start demobilising
2004 - Law changed to permit presidential re-election
2005
Jul - Justice and Peace Law comes into force, providing for demobilisation of combatants, help for them to make the transition to civilian life, and compensation for victims of war crimes
Dec - Exploratory peace talks in Havana between the ELN and the government
2006
Feb - More ELN-government talks, but don't agree anything except to talk again
Apr - Last of AUC hand in arms
May - Uribe re-elected
Nov - More ELN-government talks in Havana
Nov - Scandal erupts close to President Pastrana when eight lawmakers and a former security police chief arrested on charges they colluded with paramilitaries
2007
July - Government releases dozens of jailed FARC prisoners, hoping it will lead to hostage releases. FARC continues to say it will only free hostages if government pulls back troops and establishes a demilitarised zone
Massive protests in Bogota against kidnappings and conflict2008
Jan - FARC rebels free two women hostages after mediation by Venezuela's leftist President Hugo Chavez, raising hopes for dozens of other captives Feb - FARC frees four more hostages after Venezuelan mediation Mar - Short-lived diplomatic crisis between Colombia and its regional neighbours - Ecuador and Venezuela in particular - after Colombian raid on Ecuadorean territory which kills FARC's number two man, Raul Reyes. Rebels say Reyes had been influential in mediation to free more hostages Jul - Ingrid Betancourt and other hostages freed by Colombian troops| 2009 | 45.7 million | U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Population Division (2009) |
| 2007 | 46.1 million | U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Population Division (2006) |
| 2006 | 45.5 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2005 | 44.9 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2004 | 44.3 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2003 | 43.7 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2002 | 43.0 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2001 | 42.4 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2000 | 41.7 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2009 | 45.7 million | U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Population Division (2009) |
| 2007 | 46.1 million | U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Population Division (2006) |
| 2006 | 45.5 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2005 | 44.9 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2004 | 44.3 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2003 | 43.7 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2002 | 43.0 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2001 | 42.4 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2000 | 41.7 million | U.N. DESA (2006) |
| 2007 | 73.3 percent | U.N. DESA - World Urbanisation Prospects 2005 |
| 2006 | 73.0 percent | U.N. DESA (2005) |
| 2005 | 72.7 percent | U.N. DESA (2005) |
| 2004 | 72.4 percent | U.N. DESA (2005) |
| 2003 | 72.1 percent | U.N. DESA (2005) |
| 2002 | 71.8 percent | U.N. DESA (2005) |
| 2001 | 71.5 percent | U.N. DESA (2005) |
| 2000 | 71.2 percent | U.N. DESA (2005) |
| 2005 | 30.3 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 2004 | 31.4 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2003 | 31.8 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002 | 32.1 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2001 | 32.4 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2000 | 32.8 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2005 | 72.3 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 2004 | 72.6 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2003 | 72.4 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002 | 72.2 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2001 | 71.8 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2000 | 71.2 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2005 | 68.7 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 2004 | 69.6 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2003 | 69.3 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002 | 69.0 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2001 | 68.6 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2000 | 68.2 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2005 | 76.0 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 2004 | 75.6 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2003 | 75.4 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002 | 75.2 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2001 | 75.0 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2000 | 74.8 years | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2007 | 17 per 1,000 live births | U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) - State of the World's Children 2009 |
| 2006 | 17 per 1,000 live births | UNICEF - State of the World's Children 2008 |
| 2005 | 17 per 1,000 live births | U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) - State of the World's Children 2007 |
| 2004 | 18 per 1,000 live births | UNICEF - State of the World's Children 2006 |
| 2003 | 18 per 1,000 live births | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002 | 19 per 1,000 live births | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2001 | 19 per 1,000 live births | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2000 | 25 per 1,000 live births | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2007 | 20 per 1,000 live births | U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) - State of the World's Children 2009 |
| 2006 | 21 per 1,000 live births | UNICEF - State of the World's Children 2008 |
| 2005 | 21 per 1,000 live births | UNICEF - State of the World's Children 2007 |
| 2004 | 21 per 1,000 live births | UNICEF - State of the World's Children 2006 |
| 2003 | 21 per 1,000 live births | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002 | 23 per 1,000 live births | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 1997-2005 | 96 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 1996-2004 | 86 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 1995-2003 | 86 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 1995-2002 | 86 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 1995-2001 | 86 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 1995-2000 | 86 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2005 | 120 per 100,000 live births | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 2000 | 130 per 100,000 live births | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2000-2007 | 7 percent | U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) - State of the World's Children 2009 |
| 2000-2006 | 7 percent | UNICEF - State of the World's Children 2008 |
| 1996-2005 | 7 percent | UNICEF - State of the World's Children 2007 |
| 1996-2004 | 7 percent | UNICEF - State of the World's Children 2006 |
| 1995-2003 | 7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 1995-2002 | 7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 1995-2000 | 13 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2003-2005 | 10 percent | U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) 2008 |
| 2002-2004average | 13 percent | U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) 2006 |
| 2001-2003average | 14 percent | FAO 2006 |
| 2006 | 93 percent | UNICEF and WHO 2008 |
| 2004 | 93 percent | UNICEF and World Health Organisation (WHO) 2006 |
| 2002 | 92 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2000 | 91 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2006 | 78 percent | UNICEF and WHO 2008 |
| 2004 | 86 percent | UNICEF and WHO 2006 |
| 2002 | 86 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2000 | 86 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2004 | 92.8 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2003 | 94.2 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002 | 92.1 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2001 | 91.9 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2000 | 91.7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2004 | 92.9 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2003 | 93.7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002 | 92.1 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2001 | 91.9 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2000 | 91.7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2004 | 92.7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2003 | 94.6 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002 | 92.2 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2001 | 91.9 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2000 | 91.7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2002 |
| 2008 | 152 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2007 | 179 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2006 | 180 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2005 | 178 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2004 | 179 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2003 | 188 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2002 | 189 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2001 | 182 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2000 | 181 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2008 | 919 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2007 | 765 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2006 | 681 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2005 | 508 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2004 | 245 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2003 | 148 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2002 | 112 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2001 | 81 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2000 | 57 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2008 | 366 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2007 | 262 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2006 | 145 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2005 | 104 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2004 | 86 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2003 | 70 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2002 | 46 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2001 | 27 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2000 | 21 per 1,000 people | ITU 2009 |
| 2008 | 70 (joint) | Transparency International 2008 |
| 2007 | 68 | Transparency International 2007 |
| 2006 | 59 | Transparency International |
| 2005 | 55 (joint) | Transparency International |
| 2004 | 60 (joint) | Transparency International |
| 2003 | 59 (joint) | Transparency International |
| 2002 | 57 (joint) | Transparency International |
| 2001 | 50 | Transparency International |
| 2000 | 60 (joint) | Transparency International |
| 1990-2005 | 7.0 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 1990-2004 | 7.0 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 1990-2003 | 8.2 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 1990-2002 | 8.2 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 1990-2001 | 14.4 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2007 | 4100 current US$ | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2006 | 3420 current US$ | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2005 | 2880 current US$ | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2004 | 2500 current US$ | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2003 | 2260 current US$ | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2002 | 2230 current US$ | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2001 | 2230 current US$ | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2000 | 2080 current US$ | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2008 |
| 2007 | 207.8 current US$ billions | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2006 | 162.3 current US$ billions | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2005 | 144.6 current US$ billions | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2004 | 113.8 current US$ billions | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2003 | 91.7 current US$ billions | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2002 | 93.0 current US$ billions | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2001 | 92.9 current US$ billions | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2000 | 94.1 current US$ billions | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2006 | 6.8 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2008 |
| 2005 | 4.7 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2008 |
| 2004 | 4.9 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2008 |
| 2003 | 3.9 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2008 |
| 2002 | 1.9 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2008 |
| 2001 | 1.5 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2008 |
| 2000 | 2.9 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2008 |
| 2007 | 4.8 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2006 | 6.8 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2005 | 6.1 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2004 | 8.3 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2003 | 8.3 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2002 | 6.4 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2001 | 6.4 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2000 | 25.9 percent | World Bank Data Profile Tables 2009 |
| 2000-2004 | 135 per 100,000 people | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 1990-2004 | 135 per 100,000 people | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 1990-2003 | 94 per 100,000 people | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 1990-2002 | 109 per 100,000 people | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
| 2007 | 0.6 percent | U.N. Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS) 2008 |
| 2006 | 0.6 percent | U.N. Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS) 2008 |
| 2005 | 0.6 percent | U.N. Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS) 2008 |
| 2004 | 0.6 percent | U.N. Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS) 2008 |
| 2003 | 0.6 percent | U.N. Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS) 2008 |
| 2007 | 35 per 100,000 people | WHO 2009 |
| 2006 | 36 per 100,000 people | WHO 2009 |
| 2005 | 37 per 100,000 people | WHO 2009 |
| 2004 | 38 per 100,000 people | WHO 2009 |
| 2003 | 39 per 100,000 people | WHO 2009 |
| 2002 | 40 per 100,000 people | WHO 2009 |
| 2001 | 41 per 100,000 people | WHO 2009 |
| 2000 | 42 per 100,000 people | WHO 2009 |
| 2008 | 77232 | UNHCR |
| 2007 | 70120 | UNHCR |
| 2006 | 72796 | Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) |
| 2005 | 60415 | UNHCR |
| 2004 | 47357 | UNHCR |
| 2003 | 37995 | UNHCR |
| 2002 | 30625 | UNHCR |
| 2001 | 17938 | UNHCR |
| 2000 | 9279 | UNHCR |
| 2008 | 170 | UNHCR |
| 2007 | 168 | UNHCR |
| 2006 | 143 | UNHCR |
| 2005 | 155 | UNHCR |
| 2004 | 141 | UNHCR |
| 2003 | 186 | UNHCR |
| 2002 | 205 | UNHCR |
| 2001 | 210 | UNHCR |
| 2000 | 239 | UNHCR |
| 2008 | 2649139 - 4361355 | Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) 2008 | |
| 2007 | 2390000 - 4000000 | IDMC 2008 | |
| 2006 | 1976970-3940164 | IDMC 2007 | |
| 2005 | 1706459 - 3662842 | IDMC 2006 | |
| 2007 | 895 | Landmine Monitor Report 2008 |
| 2006 | 1167 | Landmine Monitor Report 2008 |
| 2005 | 1112 | Landmine Monitor Report 2007 |
| 2004 | 863 | Landmine Monitor Report 2005 |
| 2003 | 724 | Landmine Monitor Report 2004 |
| 2005 | 3.7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 2004 | 3.8 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2003 | 4.4 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2002-2005 | 4.8 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 2002-2004 | 4.9 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2000-2002 | 5.2 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 1999-2001 | 4.4 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 1998-2000 | No data available percent |
| 2004 | 6.7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2007/2008 |
| 2003-2004 | 6.4 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2006 |
| 2002 | 6.7 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2005 |
| 2001 | 3.6 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2004 |
| 2000 | 5.4 percent | UNDP - Human Development Report 2003 |
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts
Click here for sister organisations and more press contacts