Rich countries' inertia is sabotaging a climate deal and abandoning millions of the world's poorest people to a desperate future, said Oxfam on the final day of international
climate talks in Bonn today (12 June 2009)
Together, with over 450 development, environmental and social organisations from across the world, the international agency called for
world leaders, meeting at the G8 Summit in Italy next month, to come to Copenhagen ready to strike a post-2012 climate deal that will prevent a human catastrophe.
The machinery of the talks is
working but a lack of political will from industrialised countries has blocked progress and undermined poor country confidence in the negotiations - only a political commitment for ambitious action at
the highest level can save the talks said Oxfam.Â
Antonio Hill, Oxfam's Policy Advisor said: "In the fight against climate change we need the generals on the battlefield.
World leaders meeting at the G8 in Italy must promise to come to Copenhagen ready to strike a deal that will prevent a human catastrophe."
"Poor countries have been left stranded -
millions of people face, hunger, disease and disaster but the countries that created the nightmare are refusing to lift a finger to prevent it becoming a reality," said Hill.Â
"Poor countries were dealt another blow this week when Japan announced a pathetically low target for cutting emissions by just 8 percent on 1990 levels by 2020."
In the final
session developing countries sharply criticised industrialised countries' contribution to the talks. Over the last two weeks rich nations have failed to set an overall target for mid term
emission reductions - one of the main aims of the meeting - or put forward concrete proposals on funding to help poor countries reduce emissions and adapt to a changing
climate. Â
Hill said: "Rich country delegates have spent two weeks talking but have done nothing on the issues that really matter. Rich countries may be kidding
themselves they are working towards a deal but they are not kidding anyone else."
Despite the failure of rich countries to engage in Bonn there are a huge number of proposals on the table
- some of which could still add up to a fair and adequate deal.
"There are two deals in the hundreds of pages of the negotiating text sitting with governments today. One will secure our
future - the other will bring disaster. World leaders need to get a grip on the talks to ensure the right deal is made in Copenhagen", said Hill
/Ends
Notes to Editors:
Oxfam has spokespeople at the talks from Bangladesh, South Africa, US, UK, Germany and Australia and can arrange interviews. For more information and to
arrange an interview contact: Lucy Brinicombe in Oxford, +44 (0)1865 472192 / +44(0)7786 110054 / lbrinicombe@oxfam.org.uk, Anna Mitchell in Bonn, + 44 (0)77 96 99 32 88 or Mirjam Hägele in Bonn+ 49 (0)177 8809977
Oxfam is a founder member of the 'tck
tck tck' campaign. The campaign brings together an unprecedented alliance of faith groups, NGOs, trade unions and individual. As world leaders prepare to strike a climate deal in
Copenhagen in December, and aims to harness the voices of people from around the globe to demand an ambitious, fair and binding climate deal which reflects the latest science.
Oxfam is a member
of the Stop Climate Chaos CoalitionAnalysis of the talks
Virtually all the different countries' proposals for what needs to go into the deal are out on the table - ahead of a 17 June timeline for submission of proposals.
However the real negotiations on which proposals stay in and which are removed did not get off the ground.Â
MITIGATION
A key aim of the talks in Bonn was to
set a target for rich country emissions reductions - this has not happened. Rich countries commitments currently add up to between 7 and 15 percent cut in emissions by 2020 (relative to
1990 levels) and would put the world on track for over 3 degrees of warming. It is also significantly below the target range of 25 - 40 percent that rich countries backed one and a half
years ago when negotiations on a post Kyoto deal began in Bali.
The failure to set an aggregate target, coupled with Japan's announcement to cut emissions by just 8 percent, will
seriously undermine developing country confidence in the talks and hamper progress on the negotiations (Japan's target in the current commitment period up till 2012 is 6 percent below 1990
levels). Developing countries have said they will not start negotiating on a deal until rich countries set a collective target and over 40 developing countries - including South Africa and
India - have put forward a proposal today which outlines how much individual rich countries must cut their emissions by in order to deliver an overall reduction in emissions of 40 percent on 1990
levels by 2020.
The developing country proposal mirrors the findings of a report launched by Oxfam this week, which also calls for at least a 40 percent cut. In order to deliver
their fair share of the effort needed to reach this target Japan, which announced an 8 per cent reduction this week, must deliver a 56 percent reduction, according to Oxfam. Europe must cut emissions
by 44 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020 - it is currently committed to a 20 - 30 percent reduction. Russia, which has yet to set a mid term target, must deliver a 20 percent reduction in emissions.
Australia, which may commit to a 25 percent cut in emissions, would need to deliver reductions of 40 percent and Canada, whose commitments are equivalent to a 3 per cent drop in emissions on 1990
levels by 2020, would need to deliver a cut of 43 percent. The US must deliver a 45 per cent cut.
 FINANCE
Rich countries' performance on finance has
been even more lack luster, despite it being a crunch issue at the talks. Rich countries have failed to put a figure on the scale of the finance that is needed to help developing countries adapt to a
changing climate and scale back their emissions. They have failed to come up with any concrete suggestions on how the funds should be raised or how they should be governed and managed.
Roughly
half of the reductions. which need to be made by 2020, must be made in poor countries and the majority of developing countries will not be able to achieve emissions reductions without significant
financial incentives from rich countries.Â
The G77 group of developing countries calls for rich countries to contribute between 0.5 and 1 per cent of their GDP towards mitigation and
adaptation action in the developing world.A proposal from Mexico would make finance flows dependent on the willingness of individual countries to deliver on their funding commitments
is gaining momentum. This is a risky strategy given that rich countries are notoriously bad at delivering money promised for international aid in the past.
Oxfam is calling for the
establishment of a ‘Global Mitigation and Finance Mechanism' that would use money generated in the sale of carbon permits to guarantee a steady supply of funds. At least $150
billion is needed every year to fund both adaptation and mitigation action in developing countries.Â
ADAPTATION
Industrialised countries continue to push for
existing institutions - such as the World Bank - to manage adaptation finance instead of the new arrangements developing countries say are needed. They are also opposing immediate measures to tackle
the urgent adaptation needs of the world's most vulnerable countries, as well as proposals that would address the needs of people forced to migrate as a result of climate impacts. Developing
countries have complained that rich countries are more interested in the planning and implementation of adaptation then finding the money to pay for it.
 EMISSIONS FROM
SHIPPING AND AVIATION
Australia put forward a proposal for emissions from international aviation and shipping to be part of an international climate deal. Australia's
intervention at the climate change talks in Bonn called for regulation of aviation and shipping emissions ‘without discrimination' between countries. However it made no
reference to the impact this might have on its small island neighbours, who depend heavily on air and sea links while emitting only a minuscule fraction of the emissions of their richer neighbour.
Tanzania noted that the proposal failed to recognise that income raised from the mechanism should be directed to poor developing countries. An agreement on the proposal is unlikely
without an explicit agreement that any income raised will go to help developing countries adapt to the impacts of climate change.Â
Oxfam welcomed the move to include all emissions in
the talks but said that poor small islands nations who rely on shipping and aviation for their survival must be exempt and any funds raised from the scheme must be used to help poor countries adapt to
a changing climate and reduce their emissions.
More from the Oxfam Press Office at http://www.oxfam.org.uk/news
[ Any views expressed in this article are those of the writer and not of Reuters. ]
New Orleans Mayor C. Ray Nagin makes an address at a public forum as part of the Sustainable Globalisation summit in Sydney June 11, 2009. Mayor Nagin spoke of many of ...
