Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login

FROM THE FIELD

Brown government disappoints on first test of AIDS commitment
26 Sep 2007 11:17:00 GMT
Source: International HIV/AIDS Alliance - UK
International HIV/AIDS Alliance

Website: Website: http://www.aidsalliance.org

inthivalli logo
News from the International HIV/AIDS Alliance 25 September 2007 - for immediate release

The Alliance expressed extreme disappointment today at the announcement by the Brown government that it will not be honouring the commitments made at the G8 in June to treble the size of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria by 2010 to meet the Millennium Development Goals. Honouring this commitment would have seen UK funding to the Global Fund increase to £700m over the next three years. Instead the government will be increasing funding by just 5% per year over the next three years, to £360m for the period 2008- 2010.

The government's announcement comes the day before the start of the Global Fund's replenishment meeting, taking place from 26-28 September in Berlin, Germany. The meeting is seen as the first real test of the G8 commitments and the first real indication of Gordon Brown's ongoing commitment to tackling the global AIDS epidemic.

Alvaro Bermejo, Alliance Executive Director said:

"It is a real disappointment that the UK government didn't use this opportunity in the run up to the Global Fund replenishment conference this week to make its leadership on AIDS clear. While the Global Fund is not the only way to fund the AIDS response, this was the first test of the Brown government's ongoing commitment to tackle the AIDS epidemic. If the government wants to continue to be seen as a leader in the global AIDS response, it needs to show how it is going to honour its promises to fund universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support by 2010 in other ways."

Javier Hourcade Bellocq, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance's regional representative for Latin America and the Caribbean and alternate board member for the Communities living with HIV, Tuberculosis and affected by Malaria delegation to the Global Fund Board said:

"1.1 million people living with HIV and 2.8 million people living with tuberculosis are now alive instead of barely surviving or dying, thanks to the contribution of the Global Fund to rapidly scale up access to HIV and TB treatment. But we know how many people urgently need to get on the same treatment. We know the needs, and we know the money is there. The donor community should sustain and increase their commitments. It's about the moral and ethical obligation of those better positioned in the world to provide the means to those most in need."

Marco Gomes, member of the Communities Delegation to the Global Fund board added:

"The Global Fund works but it cannot succeed without donors' assistance. It is up to the donors to get us there. Anything else is an admission of failure on the Millennium Developments Goals."

Ends

Editor's notes

1. In 2005, G8 governments committed to universal access to HIV prevention, care and treatment. This commitment from the world's richest governments was endorsed by all UN Member States at the World Summit at the end of 2005. From that moment, all the world's governments have formally accepted the challenge of: "Developing and implementing a package for HIV prevention, treatment and care with the aim of coming as close as possible to the goal of universal access to treatment by 2010 for all those who need it."

Three months ago at the G8 summit, governments committed to triple the size of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to US$6-8 billion by 2010 to meet the Millennium Development Goals and achieve universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support.

2. The Stop AIDS Campaign, of which the Alliance is a member, is the campaigning arm of the UK Consortium on AIDS and International Development - a coalition of over 80 NGOs and Trade Unions promoting effective responses to the HIV pandemic.

3. Established in 1993, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance (the Alliance) is a global partnership of national organisations working to support community action on AIDS in developing countries. These national partners help local community groups and other non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to take action on AIDS, and are supported by technical expertise, policy work and fundraising carried out at the UK-based international secretariat and across the Alliance.

4. The Alliance has worked with community organisations from over 40 countries, provided financial support to over 3,000 projects (implemented by over 2,000 community and faith-based groups). Expenditure in 2006 alone was over US $58 million (£30 million).

5. More information about the work of the International HIV/AIDS Alliance is available from www.aidsalliance.org. Alternatively, and to arrange interviews, please contact Simon Moore. T: 01273 718744. E: smoore@aidsalliance.org or Rhian Evans. T: 01273 718961. E: revans@aidsalliance.org




[ Any views expressed in this article are those of the writer and not of Reuters. ]


Email this article       Send comments

Topics

•  Health

•  Politics of Aid

MORE >>

Emergencies

•  AIDS pandemic

MORE >>

Members

•  International HIV/AIDS Alliance - UK

MORE >>

Countries

Small country map
© 2004 Europa Technologies Ltd.
Reset map

•  Afghanistan profile
· View map

•  Albania profile
· View map

•  Algeria profile
· View map

•  Angola profile
· View map

•  Antigua profile
· View map

•  Argentina profile

•  Armenia profile

•  Azerbaijan profile

•  Bahamas profile

•  Bahrain profile

•  Bangladesh profile

•  Barbados profile

•  Belarus profile

•  Belize profile

•  Benin profile

•  Bhutan profile

•  Bolivia profile

•  Bosnia-Herzegovina profile

•  Botswana profile

•  Brazil profile

•  Brunei profile

•  Bulgaria profile

•  Burkina Faso profile

•  Burundi profile

•  Cambodia profile

•  Cameroon profile

•  Cape Verde profile

•  Central African Republic profile

•  Chad profile

•  Chile profile

•  China profile

•  Colombia profile

•  Comoros profile

•  Congo (Brazzaville) profile

•  Congo (DR) profile

•  Costa Rica profile

•  Croatia profile

•  Cuba profile

•  Cyprus profile

•  Czech Republic profile

•  Djibouti profile

•  Dominica profile

•  Dominican Republic profile

•  East Timor profile

•  Ecuador profile

•  Egypt profile

•  El Salvador profile

•  Equatorial Guinea profile

•  Eritrea profile

•  Estonia profile

•  Ethiopia profile

•  Fiji profile

•  Finland profile

•  Gabon profile

•  Gambia profile

•  Georgia profile

•  Ghana profile

•  Grenada profile

•  Guatemala profile

•  Guinea profile

•  Guinea-Bissau profile

•  Guyana profile

•  Haiti profile

•  Honduras profile

•  Hungary profile

•  India profile

•  Indonesia profile

•  Iran profile

•  Iraq profile

•  Israel profile

•  Ivory Coast profile

•  Jamaica profile

•  Jordan profile

•  Kazakhstan profile

•  Kenya profile

•  Kiribati profile

•  Korea (South) profile

•  Kuwait profile

•  Kyrgyzstan profile

•  Laos profile

•  Latvia profile

•  Lebanon profile

•  Lesotho profile

•  Liberia profile

•  Libya profile

•  Lithuania profile

•  Macedonia profile

•  Madagascar profile

•  Malawi profile

•  Malaysia profile

•  Maldives profile

•  Mali profile

•  Malta profile

•  Marshall Islands profile

•  Mauritania profile

•  Mauritius profile

•  Mexico profile

•  Micronesia profile

•  Moldova profile

•  Mongolia profile

•  Montenegro profile

•  Montserrat profile

•  Morocco profile

•  Mozambique profile

•  Myanmar (formerly Burma) profile

•  Namibia profile

•  Nauru profile

•  Nepal profile

•  Nicaragua profile

•  Niger profile

•  Nigeria profile

•  North Korea profile

•  Oman profile

•  Pakistan profile

•  Palau profile

•  Palestinian territories profile

•  Panama profile

•  Papua New Guinea profile

•  Paraguay profile

•  Peru profile

•  Philippines profile

•  Poland profile

•  Portugal profile

•  Qatar profile

•  Romania profile

•  Russia profile

•  Rwanda profile

•  Samoa (Western) profile

•  Sao Tome profile

•  Saudi Arabia profile

•  Senegal profile

•  Serbia profile

•  Seychelles profile

•  Sierra Leone profile

•  Singapore profile

•  Slovakia profile

•  Slovenia profile

•  Solomon Islands profile

•  Somalia profile

•  South Africa profile

•  Sri Lanka profile

•  St Kitts-Nevis profile

•  St Lucia profile

•  St Vincent & Grenadines profile

•  Sudan profile

•  Surinam profile

•  Swaziland profile

•  Syria profile

•  Taiwan profile

•  Tajikistan profile

•  Tanzania profile

•  Thailand profile

•  Togo profile

•  Tonga profile

•  Trinidad & Tobago profile

•  Tunisia profile

•  Turkey profile

•  Turkmenistan profile

•  Tuvalu profile

•  Uganda profile

•  Ukraine profile

•  United Arab Emirates profile

•  Uruguay profile

•  Uzbekistan profile

•  Vanuatu profile

•  Venezuela profile

•  Vietnam profile

•  Yemen profile

•  Zambia profile

•  Zimbabwe profile

MORE >>

NGO latest

•  Brown government disappoints on first test of AIDS commitment
International HIV/AIDS Alliance - UK

•  Darfur: Three ACT-Caritas staff detained and released into police custody in Zalingei
ACT - Switzerland

•  Condom Commandos
Christian Aid - UK

•  Northern Ghana in urgent need of food after devastating floods
IFRC - Switzerland

•  CARE continues to provide basic needs to earthquake affected community in Bengkulu
CARE International - UK

MORE >>

Latest news

•  AFGHANISTAN: Children share deprivations of imprisoned mothers

•  Fatah officers rally in Gaza to demand pay

•  China quality watchdog warns of fake inspections

•  Iraq Sunni party drafts new political principles

•  Crude bombs defused in Mumbai suburb

MORE >>

Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Wed Sep 26 11:21:59 2007