NEWSDESK
| KENYA Food Security Outlook | September 2007-February 2008 |
| Figure 1. Current food security conditions
|
| Figure 2. Most like food security scenario: Sep. 2007 - Feb. 2008 |
|
Figure 3. Worst case food security scenario: Sep. 2007 - Feb. 2008 |
Executive Summary
Current Food Security Situation
Overall, national food security has improved significantly across livelihoods at the conclusion of the long-rains season, which extended uncharacteristically into September in several areas. Although the season was fairly poor in the northeastern pastoral and southeastern and coastal lowlands, a good short-rains season in 2006 mitigated the impacts of the poor season on household food security. Unfortunately, elaborate livelihood interventions intended to consolidate the recovery process while mitigating the mediocre season in the northeast have not been widely implemented, slowing down the recovery.
Livestock birthings have increased as has milk availability in the pastoral livelihood. The adverse impacts of the Rift Valley Fever, including loss in productivity and market outlets, have ended. While rates of malnutrition have been on a consistent downward trend since April 2006, rates remain higher than the WHO emergency threshold in some parts of Mandera, Wajir and Marsabit districts. Pastoral areas in the northeast that received poor long rains will now begin to show signs of stress exhibited by increased migrations toward western districts and across into Somalia and Ethiopia. Debilitating livestock raiding has characterized most of 2008, compromising the recovery of pastoralists in the conflict epicenters.
Mid-season estimates by the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) point to above normal national output, in addition to favorable domestic supply from previous harvests. Unfortunately, the long rains have been excessive in key growing areas in the western and Rift Valley ‘grain-baskets’ that are reporting significant pre- and post-harvest losses of maize, beans and wheat. Substantial crop losses were also experienced in the southeastern and coastal lowlands arising from poor long rains.
An estimated 650,000 persons, predominately drought-affected and a few flood-affected, still require relief food through Cash for Work (CfW) and Food-for Work (FfW) programs. A further 2.4 million persons in pastoral, agropastoral and marginal agricultural areas are expected to benefit from non-food interventions, across sectors, following recommendations of the just-concluded long rains assessments. An estimated $6.6 million is required for livestock interventions, $7.2 million for crop production, $2.7 million for health and nutrition, $25 million for water and sanitation and $3 million for education.
Seasonal Timeline
Most likely food security scenario
Basic description of the scenario and main assumptions
| Table 1: Scenario indicators and triggers |
| Probable food security scenario
|
The climate outlook for the Kenya for the long-rains season suggests that while a La Nina event is likely, Sea Surface Temperatures (SSTs) over the Indian Ocean are gradually warming. Subsequently, dry La Nina conditions are likely to be mitigated by increased rains over the drought-prone northeast and southeastern highlands, averting a poor short-rains season. In addition, a timely onset in mid-October and clear establishment of the short rains by mid-November should enhance prospects for a normal season. As a result, livestock production will strengthen, manifested by increased birth rates, improved terms of trade for pastoralists, increased milk availability and reduced malnutrition. However, the consolidation of pastoral recovery from previous poor seasons requires the implementation of livelihood strengthening interventions.
The assumption under this scenario is that excessive and unseasonable rains over the western and Rift Valley highlands, the country’s key cropping areas, will cease during the remainder of the harvest (October-January). The rains are now causing pre-and post harvest crop losses, which have significantly reduced expected bean output and caused some appreciable wheat and maize losses. Cessation of rains could consolidate the highly favorable domestic supply of maize and result in a marked reduction in prices, which would be especially beneficial for deficit producers in the southeastern, coastal lowlands and pastoral rangelands. A normal season in the drought-prone southeastern marginal agricultural lowlands is critical because the region is overwhelmingly short-rains dependent. The assumption is that a favorable short-rains season will fully compensate for the poor long rains season in 2007.
Under this scenario, heightened incidence of conflict that characterized 2007 will be reduced significantly in response to favorable access to pasture and water, as well as the on-going conflict prevention and mitigation efforts that are being implemented by the GoK, Arid Lands and Resource Management Project (ALRMP) and NGOs. Subsequently, pastoralists in particular will freely be able to access grazing resources in the event that rains are not uniformly distributed in all areas. In addition, markets across the pastoral livelihood will be accessible resulting in expanded market participation and favorable prices to pastoralists.
Food security implications
Scenario timeline analysis
Opportunities for response
Under this scenario, interventions would aim at upholding the recovery process while at the same time building the resilience of pastoral and marginal agricultural livelihoods to future shocks. While pastoral and marginal agricultural households in drought-prone areas have experienced significant improvements, their livelihoods remain fragile after a succession of poor past seasons. Interventions are required across sectors in health and nutrition, water and sanitation, agriculture and livestock and education not only in drought-affected areas but also among households in livelihood zones that have shown appreciable gains in household food security, as in Turkana, Samburu, southern Garissa, Ijara West Pokot and Baringo districts.
Worst case food security scenario
Basic description of the scenario and main assumptions
| Table 2. Scenario indicators and triggers |
| Worst-case food security scenario
|
The October-December climate outlook for Kenya suggests that the western half of the country and areas along the coastal strip will experience normal to above normal short rains and the eastern half, normal to below normal rains. Under the worst-case scenario, the key assumption is that the forecast for below normal rains in the drought-affected northeastern pastoral and southeastern marginal agricultural areas is not mitigated by rising SSTs and increased rains over eastern Kenya. Poor rains over the east half of the country would accentuate growing food insecurity and exacerbate the scarcity of key resources, namely pasture, browse and water. Farm households in the southeastern marginal agricultural areas that are overwhelmingly short-rains dependent would experience a severe deterioration in their food security, especially after a poor long rains season that was characterized by a near total crop failure.
Another scenario assumption is that current unseasonable rains in the western half of Kenya will continue. Continued rains over the western and Rift Valley highlands could result in significant pre- and post-harvest crop damage in key growing areas. Already, an estimated 30 percent of the bean crop has been lost along with a significant amount of the wheat crop. Maize, the key staple, is much more tolerant to heavy rains, but continued rains could impede drying and harvesting of the crop or cause the crop to be harvested while still wet, accelerating post-harvest losses. Flooding along Lake Victoria and coastal areas are also likely under this scenario.
This scenario assumes that frequency of conflict, which has been prominent in pastoral areas during most of 2007, will increase. The growing scarcity of resources will precipitate competition over resources and re-open past conflict. As conflict escalates, access to localized areas of good pastures, water and browse will be impeded as the more dominant raiders drive out the rest of the pastoralists to much ‘safer’ but drier areas. Access to livestock and cereal markets will also be limited under this scenario. Subsequently, pastoralists will have to trade their livestock in uncompetitive markets, while purchasing cereals at abnormally high prices.
The final scenario assumption is that proposed interventions that were intended to mitigate the impacts of next poor season while strengthening the resilience of livelihoods will not be implemented to any significant degree. Many of these interventions are in the water, health, agriculture and livestock sectors. The livelihoods of northeastern pastoralists and southeastern and coastal marginal agricultural farmers remain fragile, after poor 2007 rains coupled with the extended drought that rain from April 2004 –March 2006.
Food security implications
Scenario timeline analysis
The quality of the short rains season will become clear by mid-November, and the operational scenario will be clarified. Continuation of excess rains in key harvesting areas in the Rift Valley and western highlands from October through December would be problematic because a lot of the mature crop could begin to rot. The bulk of the crop is harvested from November through January, a period that would more conclusively determine the national food supply.
Under this scenario, trends in livestock and cereal prices from the current period through the end of February will be indicative of whether or not drought-affected eastern pastoral and marginal agricultural households are facing prohibitive cereal prices amidst falling livestock prices. The extent to which conflict impedes pastoral households in particular from accessing markets and grazing resources will also be clarified through the same period. After consistent decline for more than one year, rates of child malnutrition in the eastern pastoral areas are expected to begin to increase as the dry season sets in.
Opportunities for response
In response to this scenario, there is a greater emphasis on humanitarian and livelihood emergency interventions, particularly in eastern pastoral areas that would face a humanitarian and livelihood crisis.
Conclusion
In the most likely food security scenario, SSTs will warm and the short rains will be good, while in the worst case, a La Nina will occur and drier conditions will prevail over eastern Kenya. However, current warming of the Indian Ocean and the recent increase in rainfall over coastal and some parts of the eastern pastoral districts would seem to suggest that the case for the first scenario is strong, at least at this point. Close monitoring of the situation is warranted in view of the fact that the southeastern and coastal lowlands and the northeastern pastoral districts experienced poor long rains in 2007 and have limited capacity to withstand another poor season. A poor 2007 short-rains season in the drought prone pastoral and cropping lowlands will likely culminate in a livelihood crisis, accelerated by the fragility of the livelihoods.