Reuters AlertNet Full site
Homepage | Newsdesk | NGO Latest | Crisis briefings | Country profiles | MediaWatch | Jobs | Alerting | Login

NEWSDESK

ANALYSIS-Doubts linger about U.S. commitment after Annapolis
28 Nov 2007 18:50:47 GMT
Source: Reuters
(Adds details, paragraphs 2, 9-11, 18-19; previous Annapolis)

By Arshad Mohammed

WASHINGTON, Nov 28 (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush has set himself the herculean task of shepherding an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal by the end of next year but doubts remain about his commitment.

Bush met Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at the White House on Wednesday to start formal peace talks after launching the initiative at a 44-nation conference in Annapolis, Md on Tuesday.

Their goal is to craft a peace treaty by the end of 2008 -- just before the U.S. president leaves office -- but analysts remain skeptical the two politically weakened leaders can cut a deal and that Bush will seriously push them to do so.

"They have got enough time. The question is whether they have the will and the skill," Aaron David Miller, a scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center think tank in Washington and a former U.S. peace mediator, said of the Bush administration.

"I am not persuaded yet that they have grasped the seriousness and the amount of work that is required to do what they say they want to do -- to reach an agreement on the core issues by the end of the Bush administration," he added.

Talks on those issues -- borders, settlements, the status of Jerusalem and the fate of Palestinian refugees -- are to begin Dec. 12 and any agreement would require compromises that will be painful for both sides.

Analysts question whether Olmert, who is unpopular among Israeli voters in part because of corruption investigations, and Abbas, who lost control of the Gaza Strip to the Islamist Hamas group in June, can deliver on any deal they might make.

"Neither has the support at home or the control of his government to do something extremely serious," said Jon Alterman of the CSIS think tank in Washington.

'PLAYING FOR KEEPS'

In part, skepticism about Bush's commitment is born of what critics consider his relative neglect of the issue for the first six years of his presidency. They also fault the lack of follow-up on the April 2003 U.S.-backed "road map" peace plan.

In June 2003, Bush brought Abbas and former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon together in Aqaba, Jordan and named a U.S. official to "ride herd" over them and ensure they kept their road map commitments.

More than four years later, the United States is still trying to get the Palestinians to crack down on militant attacks on Israel and to get Israel to freeze all settlement activity -- key elements of the road map.

"There is, I think, considerable doubt remaining about whether the administration is prepared to take on the heavy lifting ... to make this work," said Bruce Riedel, an analyst at the Brookings Institution.

In his speech at Annapolis, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal raised some doubt about U.S. determination, noting Washington had committed to try to settle the conflict "within a specific time frame and we shall hold them to that."

However, Daniel Levy of the New America Foundation said he saw some reasons for "very, very guarded optimism," including the fact that Bush demonstrated his interest in the issue simply by hosting the 44-nation meeting in Annapolis.

"This was an investment of presidential prestige that we hadn't seen before," he said.

Levy also praised the fact that the Israelis and Palestinians had agreed to work to resolve the final status issues and to try to improve the situation on the ground simultaneously as a step in the right direction.

"The key question is still the political will, the political courage on all sides," Levy said. "But you have a somewhat improved ... context in which you make those decisions of political will and political courage."

Edward Djerejian, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel and Syria, said presidential involvement was indispensable for the Israelis and Palestinians.

"These people are playing for keeps. These are issues of war and peace for them," he said. "They have to be certain that the United States, in the person of the president, is fully committed to this." (Writing by Arshad Mohammed, editing by Patricia Wilson and David Storey)


AlertNet news is provided by

Email this article       Send comments

Emergencies

•  Israeli-Palestinian conflict

MORE >>

Countries

Small country map
© 2004 Europa Technologies Ltd.
Reset map

•  Iran profile
· View map

•  Israel profile
· View map

•  Palestinian territories profile
· View map

•  Syria profile
· View map

MORE >>

NGO latest

•  UMCOR and Muslim Aid to Present at Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting
UMCOR - USA

•  CWS appeal: California wildfires
CWS

•  New Guidelines for Addressing Mental Health in Emergencies
IMC - USA

•  California Fires: Direct Relief Commits $400,000 Cash to Safety-Net Clinics
DRI - USA

•  The Power of One: ADRA Encourages Individuals to Observe World AIDS Day
ADRA - International

MORE >>

Latest news

•  ANALYSIS-Doubts linger about U.S. commitment after Annapolis

•  INTERVIEW-No Afghan opium spraying from air for now -US

•  Big powers warn Serbs, Albanians on Kosovo peace

•  UN sleuth warns that Hariri killers still strong

•  Peace process without Hamas not viable - UN

MORE >>

Disclaimers |  Copyright |  Privacy |  Contact Us |  Feedback |  About Us |  RSS XML

Last updated:Wed Nov 28 18:49:44 2007